Canara Bank vs. A. Venkataraman

Mr. Rishi Maheshwari, Adv.

Ms. Anne Mathew, Adv. Mr. Bharat Sood, Adv. Ms. Miranda Solaman, Adv.

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).2228/2021

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 25-09-2020 in WA No.515/2020 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras)

CANARA BANK & ORS. Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

A. VENKATARAMAN Respondent(s)

(IA No. 16914/2021 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ ANNEXURES)

WITH

SLP(C) No. 5695/2021 (XII)

(IA No.74313/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVIT AND IA No.74312/2021 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ ANNEXURES)

Date : 30-01-2024 These matters were called on for hearing today.

CORAM : HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE BELA M. TRIVEDI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ MITHAL

• For Petitioner(s) Mr. P. S. Sudheer, AOR Mr. Rishi Maheshwari, Adv. Ms. Anne Mathew, Adv. Mr. Bharat Sood, Adv. Ms. Miranda Solaman, Adv. Ms. Hetu Arora Sethi, AOR Mr. Rahul Jain, Adv. Mr. Abhimanyu Verma, Adv.
• For Respondent(s) Ms. Hetu Arora Sethi, AOR Mr. Rahul Jain, Adv. Mr. Abhimanyu Verma, Adv.

ITEM NO.38 COURT NO.15 SECTION XII

1. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent – A. Venkataraman in SLP (C) No.2228 of 2021, who is also the petitioner in SLP (C) No.5695 of 2021, states that the said respondent/petitioner has expired and he, being a bachelor, has no legal representatives, as per his instruction.

2. The learned counsel expresses his inability to proceed further with the matters.

3. In view of the above, the sole respondent in SLP (C) No.2228 of 2021, and sole petitioner in SLP (C) No.5695 of 2021, having expired, both the Special Leave Petitions are dismissed as having abated. However, the question of law, if any, is kept open 4. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of.

(RAVI ARORA) (MAMTA RAWAT)

COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)