Peetam vs. State Of U. P.
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
31 Jan 2012
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
REVISED ITEM NO.29 COURT NO.1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 36242/2013 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 29/04/2013 in CMWP No. 50235/2011 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad) RAMESHWAR PRASAD & ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P & ORS Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for permission to file lengthy list of dates and interim relief and office report) WITH S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 21151/2013 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 36975/2013 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing OT and Interim Relief and Office Report) Date : 22/08/2014 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN For Petitioner(s) SLP 36242 Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi,Adv. SLP..CC 21151 Mr. Deepak Goel,Adv. SLP 36975 Dr. Rajeev Sharma,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following Signature Not Verified O R D E R Digitally signed by Pardeep Kumar Date: 2014.11.15 SLP (C) No. 36242 of 2013: 13:04:07 SAST Reason: In pursuance of the order dated 9.12.2013, the petitioners have filed additional affidavit. 2 Issue notice. Dasti, in addition to the ordinary process, is permitted. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, advocate waives service for
'> 1
the respondent No. 2. Notice shall be issued only to the unrepresented respondents. In the meanwhile, it is directed that if the petitioners are in possession, they will not be forcibly dis-possessed by the respondents. It is made clear that under the garb of this order, the petitioners will not try to enter the subject property if they are not in possession. Connect with S.L.P. (C) No.30969 of 2011. SLP (C) No...CC No. 21151: Mr. Ravindra Kumar, learned counsel for the respondent No. 5 - Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority raises the grievance that copy of the special leave petition along with annexures has not been given to him till date. The advocate-on-record for the petitioner is directed to supply copy of the special leave petition along with the annexures to Mr. Ravindra Kumar, advocate within two weeks. List the matter thereafter. SLP (C) No. 36975 of 2013: In pursuance of the order dated 9.12.2013, the petitioner has filed additional affidavit. Issue notice. Dasti, in addition to the ordinary process, is 3 permitted. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, advocate waives service for the respondent No. 3. Notice shall be issued only to the unrepresented respondents. In the meanwhile, it is directed that if the petitioner is in possession, he will not be forcibly dis-possessed by the respondents. It is made clear that under the garb of this order, the petitioner will not try to enter the subject property if he is not in possession. Connect with S.L.P. (C) No.30969 of 2011. (PARDEEP KUMAR) (RENU DIWAN) AR-cum-PS COURT MASTER 4 ITEM NO.29 COURT NO.1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 36242/2013 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 29/04/2013 in CMWP No. 50235/2011 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad) RAMESHWAR PRASAD & ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUS
STATE OF U.P & ORS Respondent(s)
(with appln. (s) for permission to file lengthy list of dates and interim relief and office report) WITH S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 21151/2013 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 36975/2013 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing OT and Interim Relief and Office Report) Date : 22/08/2014 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN For Petitioner(s) SLP 36242 Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi,Adv. SLP..CC 21151 Mr. Deepak Goel,Adv. SLP 36975 Dr. Rajeev Sharma,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP (C) Nos. 35043-35044 of 2013: In pursuance of the order dated 9.12.2013, the petitioners have filed additional affidavit. 5 Issue notice. Dasti, in addition to the ordinary process, is permitted. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, advocate waives service for the respondent No. 2. Notice shall be issued only to the unrepresented respondents. In the meanwhile, it is directed that if the petitioners are in possession, they will not be forcibly dis-possessed by the respondents. It is made clear that under the garb of this order, the petitioners will not try to enter the subject property if they are not in possession. Connect with S.L.P. (C) No.30969 of 2011. SLP (C) No...CC No. 21151: Mr. Ravindra Kumar, learned counsel for the respondent No. 5 - Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority raises the grievance that copy of the special leave petition along with annexures has not been given to him till date. The advocate-on-record for the petitioner is directed to supply copy of the special leave petition along with the annexures to Mr. Ravindra Kumar, advocate within two weeks. List the matter thereafter.
SLP (C) No. 36975 of 2013:
In pursuance of the order dated 9.12.2013, the
petitioner has filed additional affidavit. Issue notice. Dasti, in addition to the ordinary process, is 6 permitted. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, advocate waives service for the respondent No. 3. Notice shall be issued only to the unrepresented respondents. In the meanwhile, it is directed that if the petitioner is in possession, he will not be forcibly dis-possessed by the respondents. It is made clear that under the garb of this order, the petitioner will not try to enter the subject property if he is not in possession. Connect with S.L.P. (C) No.30969 of 2011.
(PARDEEP KUMAR) (RENU DIWAN) AR-cum-PS COURT MASTER