Peetam vs. State Of U. P.

Æ4 ITEM NO.37 COURT.3 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2013 CC 9580-9581/2013 (From the judgement and order dated 09/08/2012 in CMWP No.37646/2012 and CMWP No.37652/2012 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD) SRI CHAND & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s) With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)) WITH S.L.P.(C).../2013 [CC NO. 9584 of 2013] With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)) S.L.P.(C) NOS. 16722-16723 OF 2013 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and prayer for interim relief and office report) S.L.P.(C).../2013 [CC NO. 10117 of 2013] With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)) Date: 12/08/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR For Petitioner(s) Dr. Rajeev Sharma,Adv. Mr. Pankaj Dubey, Adv. Mr. Bhanwar Pal Singh Jadon, Adv. Mr. Raghuvir Sharma, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R S.L.P.(Civil)...../2013 [CC 9580-9581/2013] Pursuant to the order of this Court dated May 6, 2013, an additional affidavit has been filed by the petitioners. It appears therefrom that the petitioners have already accepted the compensation without any reservation. However, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that there are similar cases where the owners have accepted the compensation but this Court has issued notice. This is not controverted by Mr. Ravindra Kumar, learned counsel for respondent No. 3 - Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority. Issue notice on the applications for condonation of delay as well as on the special leave petitions returnable in ten weeks. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, advocate, waives service for respondent No. 3 - Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority. Notice shall be sent only to unrepresented respondents. Prayer for interim relief is rejected. Connect with S.L.P. (Civil) No. 30969 of 2011.

Pursuant to the order of this Court dated May 6, 2013, an additional affidavit has been filed by the petitioner. It appears therefrom that the petitioner has already accepted the compensation without any reservation.

However, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there are similar cases where the owners have accepted the compensation but this Court has issued notice.

This is not controverted by Mr. Ravindra Kumar, learned counsel for respondent No. 3 - Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority.

Issue notice on the application for condonation of delay as well as on the special leave petition returnable in ten weeks.

Mr. Ravindra Kumar, advocate, waives service for respondent No. 3 - Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority.

Notice shall be sent only to unrepresented respondents. Prayer for interim relief is rejected. Connect with S.L.P. (Civil) No. 30969 of 2011.

S.L.P. (Civil) Nos. 16722-16723 of 2013

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that pursuant to the order of this Court dated May 6, 2013, an additional affidavit has been filed by the petitioners in special leave petition filed against the impugned order passed in CMWP No. 15485 of 2013.

We have perused the additional affidavit filed by the petitioners. In the additional affidavit, the petitioners have stated that they have not received any amount of compensation. Moreover, they claim that they are in possession.

Let notice be issued on the special leave petitions returnable in ten weeks.

Mr. Ravindra Kumar, advocate, waives service for respondent No. 3 - Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority.

Notice shall be sent only to unrepresented respondents.

If the petitioners are in actual physical possession of the subject land/s, they will not be forcibly dis-possessed by the respondents until further orders.

It is made clear that under the garb of this order, the petitioners will not try to forcibly enter into the subject land/s if they are not in actual physical possession.

Connect with S.L.P. (Civil) No. 30969 of 2011.

S.L.P.(C).../2013 [CC NO. 10117 of 2013]

Pursuant to the order of this Court dated May 6, 2013, an additional affidavit has been filed by the petitioners. It appears therefrom that the petitioners have already accepted the compensation without any reservation.

However, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that there are similar cases where the owners have accepted the compensation but this Court has issued notice.

This is not controverted by Mr. Ravindra Kumar, learned counsel for respondent No. 3 - Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority.

Issue notice on the application for condonation of delay as well as on the special leave petition returnable in ten weeks.

Mr. Ravindra Kumar, advocate, waives service for respondent No. 3 - Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority.

Notice shall be sent only to unrepresented respondents. Prayer for interim relief is rejected.

Connect with S.L.P. (Civil) No. 30969 of 2011.