Peetam vs. State Of U. P.

\226+ ITEM NO.22 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR S.G. SHAH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).30969/2011 SAVITRI DEVI Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s) (With prayer for interim relief and office report) with SLP(C) No.33984-33988/2011 SLP(C) No.2557/2012 SLP(C) No.36334-36340/2011 SLP(C) No.6539/2012 SLP(C) No.10597/2012 SLP(C) No.16336/2012 SLP(C) No.16007/2012 SLP(C) No.4687/2012 SLP(C) No.13641-13646/2012 SLP(C) No.8849/2012 SLP(C) No.7540/2012 (with office report) Date: 08/11/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Abhishek,Adv. Mr. Balraj Dewan, Adv. Mr. Ravindra Keshavrao Adsure, Adv. Mr. Ajay Marwah, Adv. Mr. Arun K. Sinha, Adv. Mr. K.K.L. Gautam, Adv. Mr. Brij Bhushan, Adv. Mr. K.S. Rana, Adv. Mr. Jitendra Mohan Sharma, Adv. Mr. Prashant Chaudhary, Adv. Mr. M.P.S. Tomar, Adv. Ms. Sandhya Goswami, Adv. Mr. Tabrez Ahmad, Adv. Mr. Syed Mehdi Imama, Adv. Mr. Samir Ali Khan, Adv. Item No.22 -2- For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. Ms. Alka Sinha, Adv. Mr. Anuvrat Sharma ,Adv Mr. Himanshu Tyagi, Adv. Ms. Asha Gopalan Nair, Adv. Mr. Vishal Mahajan, Adv. Mr. Bhaskar Y. Kulkarni, Adv.

Ms. Namita Choudhary, Adv. Mr. Deepak Goel, Adv.

Ms. Sandhya Goswami, Adv.

Mr. Rabin Majumder, Adv.

UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

SLP(C) No.30969/2011 Deleted.

In SLP(C) Nos.33984-33988 and 36334-36340/2011, the learned Advocate, Ms. Alka Sinha, appearing on behalf of Mr.Anuvrat Sharma, Advocate-on-Record confirms that they have to file vakalatnama and counter affidavit. They may do so before the next date.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has to provide additional copy of the pleadings within a week against proper acknowledgment which is to be filed on record to avoid issuance of further notice.

Nobody is present for the petitioner in SLP(C) No.7540/2012 wherein the petitioner has to pay process fee and spare copies before 24.11.2012.

Item No.22 -3-

If it is not filed, list before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for nonprosecution.

If it is filed, issue notice with dasti service upon the unserved respondents. The litigant has to confirm dasti notice directly upon the litigant-respondent. However, they are permitted to be served through the nearest Civil Court/Trial court, where private parties are concerned and through standing counsel, where state authorities are concerned, if process fee and spare copies are paid/filed before 24.11.2012.

SLP(C) Nos.10597,8849 and 2557/2012

Nobody is present for the petitioners.

Let there be a fresh notice with dasti service upon the unserved respondents. The litigant has to confirm dasti notice directly upon the litigant-respondent. However, they are permitted to be served through the nearest Civil Court/Trial court, where private parties are concerned and through standing counsel, where state authorities are concerned, if process fee and spare copies are paid/filed before 24.11.2012. SLP(C) Nos.6539 and 4687/2012

Let there be a fresh notice with dasti service upon the unserved respondents. The litigant has to confirm dasti

Item No.22 -4-

notice directly upon the litigant-respondent. However, they are permitted

to be served through the nearest Civil Court/Trial court, where private parties are concerned and through standing counsel, where state authorities are concerned, if process fee and spare copies are paid/filed before 24.11.2012.

So far as State of U.P./its officers/offices are concerned, the learned Advocate, Ms. Alka Sinha, appearing on

behalf of Mr.Anuvrat Sharma, Advocate-on-Record accepts notice for such respondents, in that case, petitioners can serve advance copies of the pleadings within a week against proper acknowledgment which is to be filed on record to avoid issuance of further notice.

SLP(C) No.8849/2012

To be listed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for deletion of several respondents at the earliest, without waiting for the other formalities of confirming service and pleadings in connected SLPs.

All the served respondents in all the SLPs may file counter affidavit before the next date.

				List again on 3.1.2013.
--	--	--	--	-------------------------

			(S.G. SHAH)
		REGISTRAR
rd