Kalvakuntla Sudhir Rao vs. Union Of India

ITEM NO.21 COURT NO.11 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Writ Petition (Civil) No. 668/2022

MAYANK SETHI Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)

(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.119843/2022-EX-PARTE STAY )

WITH

W.P.(C) No. 692/2022 (X) (FOR ADMISSION and IA No.122387/2022-STAY APPLICATION)

W.P.(C) No. 691/2022 (X) (FOR ADMISSION and IA No.122356/2022-EX-PARTE AD-INTERIM RELIEF)

Date : 29-08-2022 These petitions were called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE BELA M. TRIVEDI

	For Petitioner(s)	Mr. Krishnan Venugopal, Sr. Adv.<br>Ms. Prachi Johri, AOR<br>Mr. Dhrupad Vaghani, Adv.
		Mr. Alok Dhir, Adv.

Ms. Varsha Banerjee, Adv. Mr. Palash Singhai, Adv.

Mr. Kanishk Khetan, Adv.

• Mr. Karan Batura, AOR
• Mr. Udit Gupta, Adv. Mr. Anup Jain, Adv. Mr. Akshay Goel, Adv. Mr. Vyom Chaturvedi, Adv. Ms. Prachi Gupta, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

It is submitted that the issues involved in these writ petitions are similar and akin to those involved in other petitions pending in this Court questioning the validity of Sections 95(1), 96(1), 97(5), 99(1), 99(2), 99(4), 99(5), 99(6) and 100 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, wherein notices have been issued with interim orders.

Issue notice, returnable in six weeks.

Tag with W.P(C) No. 307 of 2022.

In the meanwhile, petitioner(s) shall not transfer, alienate, encumber or dispose of any of their assets or legal rights or beneficial interest therein; and the Resolution Professional shall not proceed with filing of the report. If the report has been filed, the same shall not be acted upon.

(SNEHA DAS) (RANJANA SHAILEY) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT COURT MASTER (NSH)