Union Of India vs. Vangeti Mallareddy (Died By Lrs)
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
First Hearing
Listed On:
7 Feb 2023
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL)………. Diary No(s).1913/2023
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 28-06-2022 in IA No.2/2021 passed by the High Court For The State Of Telangana At Hyderabad)
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
VANGETI MALLAREDDY (DIED BY LRS) & ORS. Respondent(s)
(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.20930/2023-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING)
Date : 07-02-2023 This petition was called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
For Petitioner(s) Mr. Vikramjeet Banerjee, A.S.G. Mr. Akshit Pradhan, Adv. Mr. Bhuvan Mishra, Adv. Mr. Digvijay Dam, Adv. Mrs. Manjula Gupta, Adv. Mr. Digvijay Dam, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Singh, Adv. Mr. Kartik Dey, Adv. Mr. Sunil Kumar Srivastava, Adv. Mr. Salik Ram, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR
For Respondent(s)
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
Delay condoned.
Learned Additional Solicitor General appearing for the petitioners submits that though SLP(C) No.21730 of 2022 came to be decided with this Court declining to interfere with a similar order of the High Court but, fact of the matter remains that before taking possession, total compensation had already been paid while Digitally signed by Jagdish Kumar Date: 2023.02.08 15:30:35 IST Reason: Signature Not Verified
calculating the market value of the land @ Rs.5,995/- per sq. yard and providing for the other components of compensation.
Learned Additional Solicitor General would submit that the order as challenged before the High Court, when relates to the enhanced amount of compensation and in that regard, the High Court has provided for deposit of the entire amount by the petitioners and then withdrawal of 75% thereof by the respondents without security, is likely to cause serious prejudice to the petitioners.
Issue notice.
(GAGANDEEP SINGH CHADHA) (RANJANA SHAILEY) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT COURT MASTER (NSH)