Samsul Hoque Sk vs. Jamal Uddin Ahmed

, ITEM NO.113 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MRS. RACHNA GUPTA Civil Appeal No(s). 1646/2012 SAMSUL HOQUE S.K. Appellant(s) VERSUS JAMAL UDDIN AHMED & ORS. Respondent(s) (with office report) Date : 16/07/2015 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr. Sureshan P.,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Parthiv K. Goswami, Adv. Mr. Vikash Singh,Adv. Mr. Navnit Kumar, Adv. M/s Corporate Law Group,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Service of all the five respondents is complete. Appellant and respondent No.2 have filed the statement of case but the remaining respondents have not filed the same. Stipulated time for the purpose has already expired. After the amendment in Supreme Court Rules, 2013, it is no more a mandate and it is presumed that List of Dates already filed is considered by the respondents. In the given circumstances, the appeal stands complete. Registry to process to list the same before the Hon'ble Court, as per rules. Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by

Rupam Dhamija Date: 2015.07.22 17:37:21 IST Reason:

(RACHNA GUPTA) Registrar