D. T. C vs. Balwan Singh

ITEM NO.46 Court No.10 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).3165/2012 (From the judgement and order dated 13/10/2011 in LPA No.175/2008 of The HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT N. DELHI) D.T.C. Petitioner(s) VERSUS BALWAN SINGH & ORS. Respondent(s) (With appln(s) for permission to place addl. documents on record and prayer for interim relief and office report ) Date: 02/01/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.S. THAKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA For Petitioner(s) Ms.Avinish Ahlawat, Adv. Dr. Monika Gusain,Adv. Mr. Hari Om Yaduvanshi, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. B.D. Sharma,Adv. Mr. Narottam Vyas, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks a short adjournment to file an additional affidavit specifically stating that in D.T.C. Vs. Lillu Ram Civil Appeal No. 11440 of 2011 the absence of 486 days was also covered by orders passed by the competent authority sanctioning leave without pay in favour of the employee. The affidavit shall also indicate the period for which the respondents in the present SLP were absent and the orders under which their absence was covered by the sanction of leave without pay. The

the leave sanction order shall not count as qualifying service for pension in terms of Rule 21 of the Pension Rules. Post after six weeks.

affidavit may also indicate whether any notice was issued to the

employees informing them that the period covered by

-2-

|(Shashi Sareen) | |(Veena Khera) | |Court Master | |Court Master |

f