Mohd. Sahid vs. Raziya Khanam (Died) Thr. Lrs

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble R. Banumathi
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:11 Apr 2016
CNR:SCIN010018562016

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

ITEM NO.35 COURT NO.3 SECTION XI

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 8586/2016

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 15/10/2015 in SA No. 819/2015 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad)

MOHD. SAHID AND ORS Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

RAZIYA KHANAM (DIED) THR. LRS AND ANR Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for deletion of the name of respondent and exemption from filing O.T. and interim relief and office report)

Date : 11/04/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPAN

  • For Petitioner(s) Mr. Ajay Kumar Misra, Sr. Adv. Mr. D.V. Singh, Adv. Ms. Anuradha D. Mishra, Adv. Mr. Kumar Anurag Singh, Adv. Ms. Tulika Mukherjee, Adv. for M/s Anuradha & Associates
  • For Respondent(s) Mr. Dinesh Kumar Garg,Adv. Mr. Dhananjay Garg, Adv. Mr. Deepak Misra, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

At the request of the learned counsel for the petitioners, the name of respondent no.2 is ordered to be deleted from the array of respondents, at the risk and responsibility of the petitioners. Digitally signed by PARVEEN KUMAR Date: 2016.04.13 16:26:38 IST Signature Not Verified

Learned counsel for the petitioners states, that the entire factual position depicted in paragraphs 6 and 7 of the impugned order is false and incorrect. Reason:

Issue notice.

Mr. D.K. Garg, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of all the legal heirs of deceased respondent no.1, and seeks a short adjournment, so as to enable him to file counter affidavit.

Counter affidavit be filed within three weeks.

List thereafter.

Parties are directed to maintain status quo, as it exists today, in the meantime.

(Renuka Sadana) (Parveen Kumar)

Court Master AR-cum-PS

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(19) - 10 Oct 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(20) - 10 Oct 2018

Judgement - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(18) - 25 Sept 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(17) - 20 Aug 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(16) - 19 Mar 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(15) - 12 Jan 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(14) - 11 Dec 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(13) - 25 Aug 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(12) - 8 Aug 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(9) - 17 Apr 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(10) - 17 Apr 2017

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(11) - 17 Apr 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(6) - 27 Mar 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(7) - 27 Mar 2017

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(8) - 27 Mar 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(4) - 4 Jul 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(5) - 4 Jul 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(1) - 11 Apr 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(2) - 11 Apr 2016

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(3) - 11 Apr 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Viewing