Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation vs. Santosh Janba Warghane

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble Arun Mishra
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:27 Jan 2017
CNR:SCIN010018382017

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Case Registered

Listed On:

20 Jan 2017

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

ITEM NO.25 + 55 COURT NO.9 SECTION IX

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.2185-2186/2017 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 26/10/2016 in FAST No. 19139/2015 27/10/2016 in FAST No. 19139/2015 26/10/2016 in CAF No. 672/2016 27/10/2016 in CAF No. 672/2016 passed by the High Court Of Bombay At Nagpur)

VIDARBHA IRRIGATION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

SANTOSH JANBA WARGHANE AND ANR Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and interim relief)

with

SLP(C) Nos.2859-2860/2017 (With application for deletion of the name of respondent and exemption from filingc/c of the impugned judgment and exemption from filing OT and interim relief and office report)

with SLP(C) 2861/2017 (With appln. For exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and interm relief and office report)

Date : 27/01/2017 These petitions were called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY

For Petitioner(s) Mr. Shekhar Naphade, Sr. Adv. Mr. Manish Pitale, Adv. Mr. J.B. Kasat, Adv. Mr. Chander Shekhar Ashri,Adv.

For Respondent(s)

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

Issue notice returnable in six weeks.

Dasti in addition.

It is submitted by learned senior counsel appearing for the appellants that the amount of compensation has been deposited before the High Court. Let 50% of the amount be disbursed to the claimants. With respect to the remaining 50% there shall be stay till the next date of hearing.

In the meantime there shall be stay of the impugned judgment and it will be not followed in other cases.

SLP(C) Nos.2859-2860/2017

Application for deleting the name of Respondent No.7 from the array of parties is allowed. Amendment to be carried out within period of seven days.

(HEMALATHA MOHAN) SR.P.A.

(TAPAN KR. CHAKRABORTY) COURT MASTER

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(4) - 20 Mar 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(5) - 20 Mar 2017

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(6) - 20 Mar 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(1) - 27 Jan 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(2) - 27 Jan 2017

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(3) - 27 Jan 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Viewing