Himachal Pradesh Vyapar Mandal Athourised Signatory Sumesh Kumar Sharma vs. State Of Himachal Pradesh

\232 ITEM NO.MM-2A COURT NO.2 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2014 CC 5393-5394/2014 (From the judgement and order dated 26/12/2013 in WPC No.1732/2010,WPC No.1885/2010 of The HIGH COURT OF H.P AT SHIMLA) BRANDED EDIBLE OILS MANU. ASS. & ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUS SANJEEV KUMAR & ORS Respondent(s) (With appln(s) for permission to file SLP and office report ) Date: 27/03/2014 These Petitions were called on for hearing today in the Mentioning List. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPAK MISRA For Petitioner(s) Mr. Mukul Rohtagi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Nikhil Nayyar,Adv. Mr. Ambuj Agrawal, Adv. Ms. Akanksha, Adv. Mr. Dhananjay Baija, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Taken on board. Permission to file special leave petitions is granted. Mr. Mukul Rohtagi, learned senior counsel for the petitioners submits that few special leave petitions from the impugned order have already come up before this Court and notice has been issued in those matters. He submits that although this matter is little different and certain additional points have been raised which are not involved in those special leave petitions but we are of the view that since from the impugned order, special leave petitions have been entertained, notice should be issued in these special leave petitions and these special leave petitions be connected with S.L.P. (C) No. 1152 of 2014. Issue notice, returnable in eight weeks. Dasti, in addition to the ordinary process. In the meanwhile, the operation of the paragraph 127(2)(d) of the impugned order shall remain stayed. Connect with S.L.P. (C) No. 1152 of 2014.