Himachal Pradesh Vyapar Mandal Athourised Signatory Sumesh Kumar Sharma vs. State Of Himachal Pradesh

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MRS. RACHNA GUPTA

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 1369/2014

SANYUKT VYAPAR MANDAL Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

STATE OF H.P & ORS Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 2142-2144/2014 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 2146/2014 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 8994-8995/2014 (With appln.(s) for permission to file SLP and Office Report) Date : 11/02/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Ms. Malika Joshi, Adv. Mr. Rajan Narain,Adv. Mr. Santosh Krishnan,Adv. Mr. Abhinav Mukerji,Adv. Ms. Akanksha, Adv. Mr. Nikhil Nayyar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Gaurav Govinda, Adv. Mr. Shadan Farasat,Adv. Mr. Abhishek Baid, Adv. Mr. Shreekant N. Terdal,Adv. Mr. Suryanarayana Singh, Adv. Ms. Pragati Neekhra,Adv. Mr. Varinder Kumar Sharma,Adv. Ms. Bhumika Kapur, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

O R D E R

SLP(C) No.1369/2014 Signature Not Verified

Digitally signed by Rupam Dhamija Date: 2015.02.16

Service is complete on respondent Nos.3 and 6 but no one 17:48:12 IST Reason:

has put in appearance.

Respondent No.4 has filed counter affidavit. Copy of the counter affidavit to be provided to the Ld. Counsel for the petitioner.

Respondent Nos.1, 2 and 5 have not filed the counter affidavit, despite last opportunity. Further opportunity is declined.

The matter stands complete.

SLP(C) No. 2142-2144/2014

Service is complete on respondent No.8 but no one has put in appearance.

Counter affidavit on behalf of State of M.P. and Ministry of Environment and Forests has yet not been filed. One more opportunity is granted. Be filed within four weeks. However, it shall be the last opportunity.

SLP(C) No. 2146/2014

The Ld. Counsel for the petitioner has not filed the proof of dasti service in respect of respondent No.6. One week's time is requested for the same.

Counter affidavit on behalf of respondent No.4 has already been filed.

Counter affidavit of respondent Nos.1, 2 and 5 has not been filed, despite last opportunity. Further opportunity is, therefore, declined.

Service is complete on respondent No.3 but no one has put in appearance.

State of H.P. and Union of India have not filed counter affidavit, despite last opportunity given. Further opportunity is, therefore, declined.

List again on 26.3.2015.

(RACHNA GUPTA) Registrar