State Bank Of India vs. Rajesh Agarwal

ITEM NO.50 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION X

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. S.P.S. LALER

Writ Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 138/2022

JAYESHBHAI CHANDUBHAI PATEL Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

RESERVE BANK OF INDIA & ANR. Respondent(s)

WITH

SLP(C) No. 3388/2022 (III)

(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.28286/2022-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT)

Date : 11-04-2022 This petition was called on for hearing today.

For Petitioner(s) Ms. Monisha Handa,Adv. Mr. Rajul Shrivastav,Adv. Mr. Mohit D. Ram, AOR

For Respondent(s)

UPON hearing the counsel through Video Conference, the Court made the following

O R D E R

W.P (C) No. 138/2022

The office report indicates that service of notice is complete on respondent Nos. 1 and 2 but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. Viewed thus, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court, under the rules. Digitally signed by MADHU GROVER Date: 2022.04.12 10:26:36 IST Reason: Signature Not Verified

SLP(C) No. 3388/2022

The office report indicates that service of notice is complete

on sole respondent but no one has entered appearance on his behalf.

However Ms.Jyoti, Ld. Advocate has appeared on behalf of Ms. Richa Kapoor, Ld. Advocate-on-Record for sole respondent. She seeks and is granted further two weeks time to file the vakalatnama and counter affidavit. After expiry of said period, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court, as the notice was issued returnable in four weeks.

S.P.S. LALER Registrar

MG