Sanjit Sarvan Sharma vs. Designated Officer Office Of Diva Prabhag Samitee
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
First Hearing
Listed On:
17 Jan 2020
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.46 COURT NO.13 SECTION IX
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 1276/2020
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 08-01-2020 in WP No. 102/2020 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At Bombay)
SANJIT SARVAN SHARMA & ORS. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
DESIGNATED OFFICER OFFICE OF DIVA PRABHAG SAMITEE & ORS. Respondent(s)
(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.8790/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.8791/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. )
Date : 17-01-2020 This petition was called on for hearing today.
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY
| For Petitioner(s) | Mr. Ritin Rai, Sr. Adv. | |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Utsav Trivedi, Adv. | ||
| Mr. Abhinay, Adv. | ||
| Ms. Pragya, Adv. | ||
| Mr. Himanshu Sachdeva, Adv. | ||
| Mr. Rohit Amit Sthalekar, AOR |
For Respondent(s)
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
According to the petitioners compounding is permissible in respect of unauthorised construction but such submissions seem to have not been made before the High Court. Digitally signed by ASHWANI KUMAR Date: 2020.01.18 12:52:50 IST Reason: Signature Not Verified
Be that as it may, issue notice on the question as to whether
the compounding is permissible in respect of the unauthorised construction.
Status quo**, prevailing as on today, shall be maintained for the period of eight weeks.**
(ASHWANI THAKUR) (R.S. NARAYANAN) COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)