Ravula Malleswara Rao vs. State Of A. P

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Crl.M.P.No.11821/2010,Crl.M.P.No.14876/2010 & Crl.M.P......./2010 in Crl.M.P.No.1412/2010 in SLP(Crl)... 2010

(From the judgement and order dated 11/12/2009 in CRLRC No. 264/2005 of The HIGH COURT OF A.P AT HYDERABAD)

RAVULA MALLESWARA RAO & ORS. Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

STATE OF A.P. Respondent(s) (Appln. for permission to compound the offence, application for extension of time for surrendering, application for impleadment) (With office report)

Date: 02/08/2010 This Petition was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P. SATHASIVAM (IN CHAMBERS)

For Petitioner(s) Mr. G.V.R. Choudary,Adv. Mr. K. Shivraj Choudhuri,Adv.

For Respondent(s)

UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

Application for impleadment of applicant/de facto complainant is allowed. Leave granted. The criminal appeal is disposed of in terms of the signed order.

[Madhu Bala] [Savita Sainani] Sr.PA Court Master (Signed order is placed on the file) IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1422 OF 2010 (SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION(CRL.)NO.6495 OF 2010) (@ CRL.M.P.NOS.11821/2010,14876/2010 AND CRL.M.P...../2010 IN CRL.M.P.NO. 1412 OF 2010)

RAVULA MALLESWARA RAO & ORS. ....APPELLANTS

VERSUS

STATE OF A.P. ...RESPONDENT

Application for impleadment of applicant/de-facto complainant is allowed. Leave granted.

O R D E R

The appellants/accused and the complainant(who has filed application for impleadment) filed a joint memo of compounding (Compromise) mentioning all the details about the incident and the subsequent orders passed by this Court. They also stated that both of them are closely related and they are now living very cordially. They further stated that at the instance of elders and well wishers, the appellants and the defacto-complainant have agreed to compound the offence. They also stated, in view of the compromise and settlement arrived at by the appellants and the de-facto complainant, the complaint in S.C.No.120 of 2001 and all subsequent proceedings be treated as withdrawn by the de-facto complainant and that the same be compounded by and between the appellants and the de-facto complainant, as provided under the provisions of Section 320 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

...2/- -2-

Heard learned counsel for the appellants as well as de-facto complainant and also perused the joint memo filed by them. In view of the statement made therein, the petitions and the appeal are disposed of by compounding the offence which is relatable to Sections 326 and 324 of the Indian Penal Code. The criminal appeal is disposed of on the above terms.

NEW DELHI ..............J. 02-AUG-10 [P.SATHASIVAM]