Kamal Engineers Through Its Partner vs. Lalit Sharma
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
4 Feb 2005
Order Text
ITEM NO.65 COURT NO.10 SECTION IV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS C.P.(C) NOS.606-613/2004 IN C.A.Nos.4726-4727,4734,4737,4739-40,4744 and 4750/2002 M/S. RAI & SONS Petitioner (s) VERSUS O.P. VERMA & ORS. Respondent (s) (With office report) (CA.Nos.4732-47, 4726-27, 4750-51/2002) WITH C.P.(C) NO. 599-600 of 2004 IN CA. 4763/2002 - WITH OFFICE REPORT WITH C.P.(C) NO....D 1639-40/2005 IN CA.4768/2002 (CA.NOS.4752-4807/2002) WITH
-1-
C.P.(C) NO....D 2701/2005 IN CA.NOS.4762-63, 4796-97, 4801 & 4805/2002 (C.A. NOS. 4752-4807/2002)
Date: 07/02/2005 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.M. DHARMADHIKARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.N. SRIKRISHNA
For Petitioner(s) Mr. ML. Verma, Sr.Adv. Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog,Adv. Ms. Tatini Basu, Adv.
Mr. MN. Krishnamani, Sr.Adv. Mr. S. Pani, Adv. Mr. Debasis Misra, Adv.
Mr. Anil Khetrapal, Adv. Ms. Sangeeta Gour, Adv. Ms. Reetu Rastogi, Adv. Mr. Debasis Misra, Adv.
-2-
For Respondent(s) Ms. Kamini Jaiswal, Adv. Ms. S. Bakshi, Adv.
UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
CC.Nos. 606-613, 600 and 599/2004
Learned counsel appearing for the Chandigarh Administration
is granted four weeks time to file reply affidavit in the Contempt
Petitions. Rejoinder, if any, may be filed within ten days thereafter. The officers who have been impleaded as contemnors are reported to have been posted elsewhere. Let fresh steps be taken to serve them at the new place of posting. Dasti, in addition, is also permitted. Until further orders, personal appearance of the officers is exempted.
CC.Nos....D 1639-40 & .....D 2701/2005
Issue notice subject to curing the defects.
PS to Registrar Court Master
(S. Thapar) (Shelly Sengupta)
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order