G. Narasaiah vs. N Narasimhaiah

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble B.R. Gavai, Sandeep Mehta
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:25 Mar 2025
CNR:SCIN010016262022

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Mention Memo

Before:

Hon'ble Vikram Nath, Hon'ble Sandeep Mehta

Stage:

AFTER NOTICE (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES

Remarks:

Dismissed

Listed On:

25 Mar 2025

In:

Judge

Category:

UNKNOWN

Interlocutory Applications:

8047/2022,26320/2022,170540/2022,170541/2022,

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 784-786/2022 [Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 16-11-2021 in WP No. 6615/2020 (GM-CPC) c/w WP No. 45289/2019 (GM-CPC) c/w WP No. 6915/2020 passed by the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru]

G. NARASAIAH & ORS. Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

N NARASIMHAIAH & ORS. Respondent(s)

IA No. 26320/2022 - CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION IA No. 170541/2022 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVIT IA No. 8047/2022 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 170540/2022 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES

Date : 25-03-2025 This matter was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM NATH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA

For Petitioner(s) :

Mr. Parmeshwar K, Sr. Adv. Mr. Nishanth Patil, Adv. Mr. Ayush P Shah, Adv.

Mr. Arijit Dey, Adv.

Mr. Mehul Kumar Garg, Adv.

Mr. Vineeth Pr, Adv.

Mr. Nishanth Patil, AOR

For Respondent(s) :

Mr. Rajesh Mahale, Sr. Adv.

  • Mr. Parikshith Maliye, Adv.
  • Mr. Harisha S.R., AOR
  • Mr. V. N. Raghupathy, AOR
  • Mr. Raghavendra M. Kulkarni, Adv.
  • Ms. Mythili S, Adv.
  • Mr. M. Bangaraswamy, Adv.
  • Mr. Venkata Raghu Mannepalli, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

We are not inclined to interfere with the impugned judgment(s)/order(s) of the High Court. Accordingly, the Special Leave Petitions are dismissed.

It is clarified that the High Court by the impugned order(s) has not closed the Execution Petition but only set aside the two orders passed in Execution Proceedings.

Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

(SONIA BHASIN) ASSISTANT REGISTRAR-CUM-PS

(RANJANA SHAILEY) ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(9) - 25 Mar 2025

ROP - of Main Case

Viewing

Order(8) - 13 Feb 2025

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(7) - 31 Jan 2024

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(6) - 5 Dec 2023

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(5) - 15 Dec 2022

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(4) - 11 Nov 2022

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(3) - 4 Apr 2022

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(2) - 2 Mar 2022

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(1) - 4 Feb 2022

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view