Shivaji Dattatraya @ Dattu Mule vs. Subhash Uttareshwar Patane (Died) Through Lrs

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble Sanjay Kishan Kaul
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:27 Jan 2020
CNR:SCIN010015632020

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

FRESH

Before:

Hon'ble Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Hon'ble Vineet Saran

Stage:

FRESH (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES

Remarks:

Dismissed as withdrawn

Listed On:

27 Jan 2020

In:

Judge

Category:

UNKNOWN

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

REVISED

ITEM NO.19 COURT NO.11 SECTION IX

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 2115-2116/2020

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 11-11-2019 in SA No. 76/2019 13-12-2019 in RPST No. 30439/2019 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At Bombay)

SHIVAJI DATTATRAYA @ DATTU MULE Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

SUBHASH UTTARESHWAR PATANE (DIED) THROUGH LRS. & ORS. Respondent(s) ( IA No.11512/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.11513/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ) Date : 27-01-2020 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN For Petitioner(s) Ms. V.D. Makhija, Sr. Adv. Mr. Satyajit A. Desai, Adv. Ms. Anagha S. Desai, AOR Mr. Anshuman Singh, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Abdulrahiman Tamboli, Adv. Mr. Rahul Joshi, AOR

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

Learned senior counsel for the petitioner after some arguments seeks to withdraw the Special Leave Petitions as she submits that the appropriate course of action for the petitioner would have been to move an application under Order IX Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 before the trial Court which could have deciphered whether the petitioner had actually been served with the Summons or not.

The Special Leave Petitions are dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to take recourse to such remedy as may be available in law. Digitally signed by ASHA SUNDRIYAL Date: 2020.02.07 16:51:42 IST Reason: Signature Not Verified

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 2115-2116/2020

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 11-11-2019 in SA No. 76/2019 13-12-2019 in RPST No. 30439/2019 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At Bombay)

SHIVAJI DATTATRAYA @ DATTU MULE Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

SUBHASH UTTARESHWAR PATANE (DIED) THROUGH LRS. & ORS. Respondent(s) ( IA No.11512/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.11513/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ) Date : 27-01-2020 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN For Petitioner(s) Ms. V.D. Makhija, Sr. Adv. Mr. Satyajit A. Desai, Adv. Ms. Anagha S. Desai, AOR Mr. Anshuman Singh, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Abdulrahiman Tamboli, Adv. Mr. Rahul Joshi, AOR

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

Learned senior counsel for the petitioner after some arguments seeks to withdraw the Special Leave Petitions as she submits that the appropriate course of action for the petitioner would have been to move an application under Order X Rule XI of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 before the trial Court which could have deciphered whether the petitioner had actually been served with the Summons or not.

The Special Leave Petitions are dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to take recourse to such remedy as may be available in law.

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(1) - 27 Jan 2020

ROP - of Main Case

Viewing
Similar Case Search

Same Parties

Search in District Courts Data