Naorem Praffulo vs. State Of Manipur
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
Æ1ITEM No. 1 Court No. 2 SECTION PIL A/N MATTER S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Writ Petition(Civil) No.196/2001 PEOPLE'S UNION FOR CIVIL LIBERTIES Petitioner (s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent (s) (With applns.(s) for interim relief and office report) WITH W.P.(C) 498/2001 [Jammu & Kashmir National Panthers Party Vs. Union of India & Ors.] Date : 21/11/2001 This Petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.N. KIRPAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.G. BALAKRISHNAN For Petitioner (s) Mr. Colin Gonsalvez, Adv. Dr. Yug Chaudhary, Adv. Ms. Tashi D. Bhutia, Adv. Ms. Aparna Bhat, Adv. Petrs in WP 498/01 Mr. Bhim Singh, Adv. Mr. Mansoor Ali, Adv. Mr. Dinehs Kumar Garg, Adv. For Respondent (s) U O I Ms. Meenakshi Arora, Adv. Mr. B V Balaram Das, Adv. F C I Ms. Indra Sawhney, Adv. State of Orissa M/s Radha Shyam Jena & S. Ray, Advs. State of Rajasthan Ms. Sandhya Goswami and Mr. M P S Tomar, Advs. State of Himachal Pradesh Mr. Naresh K Sharma, Adv. State of Uttranchal Ms. Rachana Srivastava, Adv. State of Assam Ms. Asha G Nair, Adv. Ms. Krishna Sarma and Mr. V K Sidharthan, Advs. for Corporate Law Group, Advs. State of U.P. Mr. Ajay K Agrawal, Adv. Ms. Alka Agrawal, Adv. Mr. Ashok K Srivastava, Adv. State of Karnataka Mr. Sanjay R Hegde, Adv. Mr. Satya Mitra, Adv. ....2/-
: 2 :
State of Sikkim Mr. A Mariarputham, Adv. Ms. Aruna Mathur and Mr. Anurag D Mathur, Advs. for M/s. Arputham, Aruna & Co.,Advs. Govt. of Pondicherry Mr. V G Pragasam, Adv. State of Arunachal Pradesh Mr. Anil Shrivastav, Adv. State of Meghalaya Mr. Ranjan Mukherjee, Adv. State of Nagaland Mr. S K Shandilya, Adv. Ms. V D Khanna, Adv. State of Goa Ms. A Subhashini, Adv. State of Punjab Ms. Jayshree Anand, Addl.Adv.Genl., Pb. Mr. G Sivabalamurugan, Mr. Rajeev Sharma Advs. State of Maharashtra Mr. S S Shinde, Adv. Mr. S V Deshpande, Adv. State of Manipur Mr. S. Biswajit, Adv. Mr K H Nobin Singh, Adv. State of Gujarat Ms. Hemantika Wahi, Adv. Ms. Sumita Hazarika, Adv. State of M.P. Mr. B.S. Banthia, Adv. Mr. Satish K Agnihotri, Adv. Mr. Anil K Pandey and Mr. Rohit Kumar Singh, Advs. State of Chhattisgarh Mr. Ashwani Kumar, Sr. Adv. Mr. Prakash Shrivastava, Adv. State of Tripura Mr. Rahul Singh, Ms. Vimla Sinha & Mr. Gopal Singh, Advs. State of Kerala Mr. Ramesh Babu M R, Adv. UT of Chandigarh Ms. Kamini Jaiswal, Adv. Ms. Shomila Bakshi and Ms. Aishwarya Rao, Advs. State of West Bengal Mr. Tara Chandra Sharma, & Ms. Neelam Sharma, Advs. State of Tamil Nadu Mr. P N Ramalingam, Adv. Mr. V Balaji, Adv. NCT Delhi Mr. Ashok Bhan, Ms. Sunita Sharma, Mr. K C Kaushik and Mr. D S Mahra, Advs. UTs of Andaman & Ms. Sunita Sharma, Adv. Nicobar, Dadra & Nagar Mr. K C Kaushik, Adv. Haveli, Daman & Diu Mr. D S Mahra, Adv. and Lakshadweeep ....3/- : 3 :
State of Haryana Mr. J.P. Dhanda, Adv. Mr. K.P. Singh, Adv.
| State of Bihar | Mr. Kumar Rajesh Singh, Adv.<br>Mr. B.B. Singh, Adv. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| State of Andhra Pradesh | Mr. T V Ratnam, Adv.<br>Mr. K Subba Rao, Adv. | ||
| State of Mizoram | Ms. Hemantika Wahi, Adv.<br>Ms. Sumita Hazarika, Adv. | ||
| State of Jharkhand | Mr. Rajesh Pathak, Adv.<br>Mr. Ashok Mathur, Adv. | ||
| State of Jammu & Kashmir | Mr. Anis Suhrawardy, Adv. | ||
| UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following<br>O R D E R | |||
| LITTTTTJ | |||
| .SP2<br>W.P.(C) NO. 196/2001@@<br>EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE | |||
| Union<br>of<br>ensure<br>that<br>implemented<br>and<br>are<br>intended.<br>adjourned to 28th November, 2001. | India<br>will indicate as to how<br>it<br>will<br>the<br>schemes<br>formulated<br>by<br>itself<br>are<br>benefits received by those for whom<br>they<br>In<br>view<br>of<br>the<br>above,<br>the<br>matter<br>is | ||
| W.P. (C) No. 498/2001@@<br>EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE | |||
| Reply<br>of<br>be<br>December,<br>2001.<br>The | be filed by the Union of India and the State<br>Jammu and Kashmir within two weeks.<br>Rejoinder, if any,<br>filed within five days thereafter.<br>To come up on<br>11th<br>pendency<br>of this petition should not<br>prevent | ||
| the District and the State Authorities from ensuring proper<br>food and clothing to the needy in the State. | |||
| .SP1 |
| Kalyani. | (RAMESH CHAND) @@ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA | ||||
| COURT MASTER @@ | ||||
| A | AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA |