Pradeep Joshi vs. State Of Mp

Court:Supreme Court of India

Judge:Hon'ble Kurian Joseph

Case Status:Disposed

Order Date:20 Feb 2017

CNR:SCIN010013202017

AI Summary

In a crucial procedural ruling, the Supreme Court of India has dismissed a Special Leave Petition, refusing to interfere with a High Court's decision to remand a matter back to the District Collector for fresh consideration. This decision underscores the Apex Court's stance on not intervening in High Court orders that aim for a fresh review in accordance with law, thereby allowing the lower court's procedural directives to stand.

Ratio Decidendi:

The Supreme Court will generally not interfere with a High Court's order that merely remands a matter to a lower authority for fresh consideration in accordance with law, particularly at the Special Leave Petition stage, unless there are exceptional circumstances or a clear error of law.

Obiter Dicta:

The Court's decision to not interfere at this stage implicitly encourages parties to exhaust remedies before lower forums when a clear procedural direction has been issued, rather than prematurely approaching the Apex Court.

Case Identifiers

Primary Case No:5376/2017

Case Type:Special Leave Petition (Civil)

Case Sub-Type:SLP - Remand Order Challenge

Secondary Case Numbers:1320/2017, SCIN010013202017

Order Date:2017-02-20

Filing Year:2017

Court:SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Bench:Division Bench

Judges:Hon'ble Kurian Joseph, Hon'ble R. Banumathi

Petitioner's Counsel

Fakhruddin

Senior Advocate - Appeared

Raj Kishor Choudhary

Advocate - Appeared

eCourtsIndia AI^TM

Brief Facts Summary

Pradeep Joshi filed a Special Leave Petition (Civil) in the Supreme Court of India, challenging a final judgment and order dated 2016-12-20 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Gwalior in WA No. 404/2016. The impugned High Court order had remanded the matter to the District Collector with directions to pass fresh orders in accordance with law. The Supreme Court, after hearing the counsel, dismissed the Special Leave Petition, declining to interfere with the High Court's remand order.

Timeline of Events

2004-02-28

High Court of Madhya Pradesh passed an order in WP-2828-2004 (earliest connected case).

2006-11-10

High Court of Madhya Pradesh passed an order in WP-5823-2006 (connected case).

2016-12-20

High Court of M.P. at Gwalior passed final judgment and order in WA No. 404/2016, remanding the matter to District Collector to pass fresh orders.

2017-01-11

Special Leave Petition filed in the Supreme Court of India.

2017-02-13

Special Leave Petition registered in the Supreme Court of India.

2017-02-20

Supreme Court heard and dismissed the Special Leave Petition.

Key Factual Findings

The High Court has only remanded the matter to the District Collector to pass fresh orders, in accordance with law.

Source: Current Court Finding

Primary Legal Issues

1.Whether the Supreme Court should exercise its discretionary power under Article 136 of the Constitution to interfere with a High Court's order of remand to a lower administrative authority.

Secondary Legal Issues

1.The appropriateness and legality of the High Court's remand order to the District Collector for fresh consideration in accordance with law.

Petitioner's Arguments

The petitioner, Pradeep Joshi, likely argued that the High Court's order remanding the matter to the District Collector was erroneous or unwarranted, seeking the Supreme Court's intervention to set it aside.

Respondent's Arguments

The respondent, State of M.P. and Ors., likely contended that the High Court's remand order was appropriate and within its powers, urging the Supreme Court not to interfere with it.

Court's Reasoning

The Supreme Court reasoned that since the High Court had merely remanded the matter to the District Collector to pass fresh orders in accordance with law, there was no compelling reason to interfere with that procedural direction at this stage. The court chose not to delve into the merits of the High Court's decision to remand but focused on the nature of the order itself.

Judicial Philosophy Indicators:

Emphasis on Judicial Restraint
Adherence to Procedural Propriety

Order Nature:Procedural

Disposition Status:Disposed

Disposition Outcome:Dismissed

Impugned Orders

High Court of M.P. at Gwalior

Case: WA No. 404/2016

Date: 2016-12-20

Specific Directions

1.The special leave petition is hence dismissed.
2.Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

Precedential Assessment

Non-Binding (Procedural)

The order dismisses a Special Leave Petition without delving into the substantive merits of the underlying dispute, specifically stating non-inclination to interfere with a High Court's remand order. It reinforces existing principles regarding the Supreme Court's discretionary jurisdiction in procedural matters rather than establishing new law.

Tips for Legal Practice

1.Legal professionals should advise clients that the Supreme Court exhibits a general reluctance to intervene in High Court orders that merely remand a matter for fresh consideration by a lower authority.

2.When a remand order is issued, it is typically more judicious to pursue the matter before the lower authority as directed, rather than filing an SLP seeking to overturn the remand itself, unless there is a clear jurisdictional error or grave injustice.

3.The dismissal of a Special Leave Petition at this stage implies the petitioner must now proceed with the fresh hearing before the District Collector as per the High Court's original directive.

Legal Tags

Supreme Court discretion on remand order interferenceProcedural dismissal of Special Leave Petition civilAppellate jurisdiction regarding High Court procedural ordersNon-interference principle for administrative remandsSupreme Court of India Gwalior High Court appeal

Disclaimer: eCourtsIndia (ECI) is not a lawyer and this analysis is generated by ECI AI, it might make mistakes. This is not a legal advice. Please consult with a qualified legal professional for matters requiring legal expertise.

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Case Registered

Listed On:

13 Feb 2017

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 5376/2017

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 20/12/2016 in WA No. 404/2016 passed by the High Court of M.P. at Gwalior)

PRADEEP JOSHI Petitioner(s)

STATE OF M.P. AND ORS Respondent(s)

VERSUS

(with appln. (s) for exemption from filing O.T. and interim relief)

Date : 20/02/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI

For Petitioner(s) Mr. Fakhruddin,Sr.Adv. Mr. Raj Kishor Choudhary,Adv.

For Respondent(s)

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

The High Court has only remanded the matter to District Collector to pass fresh orders, in accordance with law. In that view of the matter, we are not inclined to interfere with the matter at this stage.

The special leave petition is hence dismissed. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

(NARENDRA PRASAD) (RENU DIWAN) COURT MASTER ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(1) - 20 Feb 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(2) - 20 Feb 2017