Gauri Maulekhi vs. Union Of India Ministry Of Environment, Forest And Climate Change Secretary
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
11 Jan 2016
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
W.P.(C)NO.24/2016
ITEM NO.301 COURT NO.4 SECTION PIL(W) S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Writ Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 24/2016 COMPASSION UNLIMITED PLUS ACTION Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Respondent(s) (With appln.(s) for impleadment and intervention and permission to appear and argue in person and stay/interim directions and office report) (For final disposal) WITH W.P.(C) No. 23/2016 (With appln.(s) for directions and intervention and stay and Office Report) W.P.(C) No. 25/2016 (With appln.(s) for interim relief and Interim Relief and Office Report) W.P.(C) No. 26/2016 (With appln.(s) for directions and Office Report) W.P.(C) No. 27/2016 (With Office Report) W.P.(C) No. 88/2016 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and Office Report) Date : 09/11/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPAK MISRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sidharth Luthra,Sr. Adv. Ms. Aparna Bhat,Adv. Mr. Gautam Khazanchi,Adv. Mr. Mayank Sapra,Adv. Ms. Anjali Sharma,Adv. Mr. Balraj Dewan,Adv. Mr. N.G. Jayasimha,Adv. Dr. A.M. Singhvi,Sr. Adv. Ms. Supriya Juneja,Adv. Mr. Aditya Singla,Adv. Mr. Avishkar Singhvi,Adv. Ms. Mehaak Jaggi,Adv. Mr. Mishal Johari,Adv. Digitally signed by SAPNA BISHT Date: 2016.11.09 17:01:24 IST Reason: Signature Not Verified
Mr. M.S. Ganesh,Sr. Adv. Mr. Seshachary,Adv. Ms. Enakshi Mukhopadyay,Adv. Mr. Purushottam Sharma Tripathi,Adv. Ms. Priyadarshini Sreenivasa,Adv. Mr. Siddhartha K. Garg,Adv. Mr. Ajit Sharma,Adv. Mr. Colin Gonsalves,Sr. Adv. Mrs. Supriya P.,Adv. Mr. Subodh S. Patil,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. P.S. Narsimha,ASG Ms. Arunima Dwivedi,Adv. Mr. Shamik Sanjanwala,Adv. Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker,Adv. Mr. Sanjay R. Hegde,Sr. Adv. Mr. S. Nithin,Adv. Mr. Atul Vinod Shankar,Adv. Mr. Anil Kumar Mishra-i,Adv. Mr. Pranjal Kishore,Adv. Mr. Ankur S. Kulkarni,Adv. Mr. Bijan Kumar Ghosh,Adv. Mr. C. K. Sasi,Adv. Mr. Deepak Anand,Adv. Mr. Shekhar Naphade,Sr. Adv. Mr. Subramonium Prasad,Sr. Adv. Mr. M. Yogesh Kanna,Adv. Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar,Adv. Mr. Ajit B. Kale,Adv. Mr. Anand Landge,Adv. Mr. Siddheshwar B.,Adv. Mr. Ravindra Keshavrao Adsure,Adv. Mr. Anupam Tripathi,Adv. Mr. Vishnu Sharma,Adv. Ms. Aakanksha Pandit,Adv. Ms. Gunjan Singh,Adv. Mr. Aniruddha Rajput,Adv. Mr. Suhas Kadam,Adv. M/s Lemax Lawyers & Co.,Advs.
Ms. Naresh Bakshi,Adv. Mr. Anirudh Sharma,Adv. Mr. Rajiv Dalal Barrister,Adv. Mr. Abhaid Parikh,Adv. Mr. Naresh Bakshi,Adv. Mr. S.K. Pabbi,AAG Ms. Disha Singh,Adv. Mr. Shivendu Gaur,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
Heard in-part.
O R D E R
In course of hearing, we have been apprised by Mr. Shekhar Naphade, learned senior counsel along with Mr. Yogesh Kanna, learned counsel for the State of Tamil Nadu that the State has filed a review petition. On enquiry being made, it has been brought to our notice that the review petition is defective.
Mr. Naphade, learned senior counsel has submitted that he has to argue the review first or the review should be heard along with this writ petition. Learned counsel for the petitioners have no objection.
In view of the aforesaid, let the matters be listed along with the review petition which is defective at 2.00 p.m. on 16th November, 2016.
SR. P.A. COURT MASTER
(SAPNA BISHT) (H.S.PARASHER)