Thota Venkateswara Rao vs. The State Election Commission& Ors.
Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble Kurian Joseph
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:22 Jan 2015
CNR:SCIN010011252015
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
15 Jan 2015
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
\232 | 1 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITEM NO.29 | COURT NO.7 | SECTION XIIA | |||||
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F<br>I N D I A<br>RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS | |||||||
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) | No(s). | 1359/2015 | |||||
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 11/12/2014<br>in WA No. 1149/2014 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At<br>Hyderabad For The State Of Telangana And The State Of Andhra<br>Pradesh) | |||||||
s) | THOTA VENKATESWARA RAO | Petitioner( | |||||
VERSUS | |||||||
s) | THE STATE ELECTION COMMISSION AND | ORS. | Respondent( | ||||
(with interim relief and office report)<br>WITH<br>SLP(C) No. 1504/2015<br>(With appln.(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned<br>judgment and Interim Relief and Office Report) | |||||||
SLP(C) No. 1429/2015<br>(With appln.(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned<br>judgment and Interim Relief) | |||||||
Date : 22/01/2015 These petitions were called on for hearing today. | |||||||
CORAM : | |||||||
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR<br>HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN | |||||||
For Petitioner(s) | Mr.<br>Mr.<br>Mr.<br>Mr. | A.K. Ganguli,Sr.Adv.<br>Prashant Mathur,Adv. | Guntur Pramod Kumar,Adv.<br>Prashant Chaudhary,Adv. | ||||
For Respondent(s) | Mr.<br>Mr.<br>Mr.<br>Ms.<br>Ms. | A.D.N. Rao,Adv.<br>Annam Venkatesh,Adv.<br>Sudipto Sircar,Adv.<br>Vaishali R.,Adv.<br>Neelam Jain,Adv. | |||||
Signature Not Verified | Ms. Tatini Basu,Adv. | ||||||
Digitally signed by<br>Om Parkash Sharma<br>Date: 2015.01.22 | UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following | ||||||
Reason: | 17:16:21 IST | O R D E R | |||||
Issue<br>notice | in<br>these | SLPs | returnable | in<br>two | |||
weeks.<br>accept | Ms. | Tatini<br>Basu,Advocate<br>and<br>Mr.<br>A.D.N.<br>Rao,<br>Advocate | |||||
2 | |||||||
notice on behalf of respondent No.4 and 5 respectively. In the meanwhile, there shall be interim stay of the direction as prayed in prayer (a) in all the three SLPs.
[O.P. SHARMA] [INDU BALA KAPUR] COURT MASTER COURT MASTER
Share This Order
Case History of Orders
Similar Case Search