The State Of Manipur vs. Paonam Lily Chanu
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
17 Mar 2023
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
1
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No(s). 1076/2023
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 14-02-2022 in WA No. 16/2022 with MC(WA) No. 34/2022 passed by the High Court of Manipur at Imphal)
THE STATE OF MANIPUR & ORS. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
PAONAM LILY CHANU Respondent(s)
(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.45815/2023-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.45818/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.45816/2023-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING / CURING THE DEFECTS)
Date : 17-03-2023 This petition was called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY S. OKA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL
| For Petitioner(s) | Mr. Pukhrambam Ramesh Kumar, AOR |
|---|---|
| Mr. Karun Sharma, Adv. | |
| Ms. Anupama Ngangom, Adv. | |
| For Respondent(s) | Ms. Aswathi M.K., AOR<br>Mr. L.k. Paonam, Adv. | |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Tomthinnganbi Koijam, Adv.<br>Mr. Niraj Bobby Paonam, Adv. |
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
Heard the learned counsel appearing for the
petitioners.
Delay condoned.
Considering the credentials of the respondent and the findings recorded by the Division Bench in paragraphs 9 and 10 of the impugned judgment, this is not a fit case where we should invoke our jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution of India. We make it clear that though we are not interfering with the orders impugned, the questions of law are kept open.
Subject to above, the Special Leave Petitions are dismissed.
Pending application also stands disposed of.
(ANITA MALHOTRA) (A.V.G.V.RAMU) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER