Dr. Siddharth Kumar Dey vs. Union Of India
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Fixed Date by Court
Before:
Hon'ble Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Hon'ble M.M. Sundresh
Stage:
AFTER NOTICE (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES
Remarks:
List On (Date) [10-03-2022]
Listed On:
14 Feb 2022
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.32 Court 6 (Video Conferencing) SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 897-898/2022 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 26-10-2021 in WPC No. 180/2019 07-12-2021 in WPC No. 180/2019 passed by the High Court Of Gauhati At Kohima) DR. SIDDHARTH KUMAR DEY & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.9666/2022-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ) Date : 14-02-2022 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. SUNDRESH For Petitioner(s) Mr. Siddhartha Dave, Sr. Adv. Mr. Aman Mishra, Adv. Mr. Aditya Vikram Singh, Adv. Ms. Saumya Gupta, Adv. Ms. Prachi Pratap, Adv. Dr. Prashant Pratap, Adv. Ms. Pallavi Pratap, AOR For Respondent(s) Ms. Nidhi Mittal,Adv. Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, AOR Mr. Ashok Panigrahi, Adv. Mr. Apoorv Kurup, Adv. Mr. Manish, Adv. Mr. Mohammed Akhil, Adv. Nagaland Ms. K. Enatoli Sema, AOR Mr. Amit Kumar Singh, Adv. Ms. Chubalemla Chang, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The office report shows that a number of respondents are not served. However, it appears that respondent Digitally signed by Charanjeet kaur Date: 2022.02.14 17:13:20 IST Reason: Signature Not Verified
Nos.9 to 110 are proforma respondents.
Similarly, respondent No.8, State of West Bengal is not directly concerned.
Learned counsel has entered appearance for respondent Nos.3 and 4 and will either appear for respondent Nos.5 to 7 or will ensure that an arrangement is made for somebody to appear for them. We may notice that the memo of parties should be corrected as "West Bengal" appears in the description of respondent Nos.3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 while it should end with "Nagaland".
Service on respondent No.2 is complete but none has put in appearance.
Learned counsel also appears for respondent No.1 and accepts notice.
Let counter affidavits be filed within two weeks. List on 10.03.2022.
(ASHA SUNDRIYAL) (POONAM VAID) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS COURT MASTER (NSH)