Vijay Singh vs. Mihi Lal (Since Died) Hence Thereafter His Legal Heir Bhikam Singh

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble B.V. Nagarathna
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:15 Apr 2024
CNR:SCIN010009642024

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Case Registered

Listed On:

15 Apr 2024

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

COURT NO.12

SECTION XI

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No(s). 964/2024

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 13-04-2022 in SA No. 29/2005 28-10-2023 in CMRA No. 459/2023 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad)

VIJAY SINGH

Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

MIHI LAL (SINCE DIED) HENCE THEREAFTER HIS LEGAL HEIR BHIKAM SINGH & ORS.

Respondent $(s)$

No.87361/2024-CONDONATION $OF$ DELAY $IN$ FILING and $TA$ (IA No.87364/2024-EXEMPTION FROM FILING $0.T.$ and IA No.87363/2024-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING/CURING THE DEFECTS)

Date: 15-04-2024 These petitions were called on for hearing today.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V. NAGARATHNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KAROL

For Petitioner(s) Mr. Thomas Oommen, AOR Ms. Nandita Rao, Adv. Mr. Sanjeev Gupta, Adv. Mr. Jai Shankar, Adv. Mr. Amit Kumar Dubey, Adv. Mr. Mayank Basoya, Adv. Ms. Mary Oommen, Adv. Ms. Rebecca Koshy, Adv.

For Respondent(s)

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following $0 R D E R$

We have heard learned counsel Mr. Thomas Oommen for the petitioner.

The delay of 543 days in filing the special leave petitions is revidence, as the petitioner had availed the remedy of review of the Title 0<sup>11</sup>der dated 13.04.2022. The delay in refiling is also condoned.

$\mathbf{1}$

However, we do not find any merit in the special leave petitions.

Hence, the special leave petitions are dismissed.

Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

(RADHA SHARMA) (POOJA SHARMA)

COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)