Aswathnarayanaswamy vs. The Board Of Directors, Karnataka Land Army Corporation Limited
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Fixed Date by Court
Before:
Hon'ble A.S. Bopanna, Hon'ble Hima Kohli
Stage:
FRESH (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES
Remarks:
Notice [interim stay]
Listed On:
30 Jan 2023
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Nos.1596-1598/2023
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 28-09-2022 in IA No. 1/2019 and IA No. 2/2019 in WA No. 4733/2011 and IA No. 1/2019 and IA No. 2/2019 in WA No. 4734/2011 passed by the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru)
ASWATHNARAYANASWAMY Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, KARNATAKA LAND ARMY CORPORATION LIMITED & ANR. Respondent(s)
(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.13481/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.,IA No.12894/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T., IA No.13480/2023- PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/ FACTS/ANNEXURES , I.A. NO. 20398/2023-APPLICATION FOR FILING ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS AND I.A. NO. 20399/2023-APPLICATION FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.)
Date : 30-01-2023 These petitions were called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI
For Petitioner(s) | Mr. Basava Prabhu Patil, Sr. Adv. | |
---|---|---|
Mr. Shailesh Madiyal, Adv. | ||
Mr. Vinayaka Pandit, Adv. | ||
Mr. Rajan Parmar, Adv. | ||
Mr. Akshay Kumar, kAdv. | ||
Mr. Mrigank Prabhakar, AOR | ||
Ms. Avinashi K. Bedi, Adv. |
For Respondent(s)
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
Learned senior counsel for the petitioner would refer to us the documents produced alongwith I.A. No. 20398/2023 to point out that pursuant to the inquiry, punishment has been imposed on 13.07.2016 after the writ appeal was disposed of on 11.03.2015 Digitally signed by Rajni Mukhi Date: 2023.01.30 16:27:36 IST Reason: Signature Not Verified
1
taking note that the inquiry notice had already been issued. In that view, the matter requires consideration.
Issue notice to the respondents.
In the meantime, there shall be interim stay of the impugned order.