Cellular Operators Association Of India Director General vs. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited Chairman

f9 1

ITEM NO.38 COURT NO.12 SECTION XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 4459 OF 2014 EENADU TELEVISION PVT.LTD. Appellant (s) VERSUS NOIDA SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY PARK LTD. Respondent(s) (With appln(s) for interim Relief,exemption from filing c/c of the impugned Judgment and office report) Date: 08/05/2014 This Appeal was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. GOPALA GOWDA For Appellant(s) Mr. Maninder Singh, Sr. Adv. Mr. Balaji Srinivasan,Adv. Mr.Mayank Kshirsagar, Adv. Mr. Prabhat Ranjan, Adv. Ms. Vaishali Dixit, Adv. Ms. Srishti Govil, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Vivek Chib, Adv. Mr. Gautam Narayan,Adv. Mr. Joby P. Varghese, Adv. Mr. Mubashir, Adv. Mr. Kushal Gupta, Adv. Mr. Asif Ahmad, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice to the respondent to show cause as to why the appeal be not admitted. Mr. Vivek Chib, Advocate has entered appearance on behalf of the respondent. He seeks an adjournment, so as to enable the respondent to file counter affidavit. Prayer is allowed. Counter affidavit be filed within four weeks. Rejoinder, if any, be filed within two 2 weeks thereafter. List thereafter.

In the meantime, the appellant shall comply with the impugned order within two days from today. Consequent upon compliance (within two days), further contempt proceedings pending against the appellant shall remain stayed. It is also made clear that the release of signals, by the appellant, shall be subject to the final outcome of this appeal. (Parveen Kr.Chawla) (Phoolan Wati Arora) Court Master Assistant Registrar 3 ITEM NO.38/1 COURT NO.12 SECTION XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 4555 OF 2014 MAA TELEVISION NETWORK LIMITED Appellant (s) VERSUS NOIDA SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY PARK LTD. Respondent(s) (With appln(s) for ex-parte stay and office report) Date: 08/05/2014 This Appeal was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. GOPALA GOWDA For Appellant(s) Mr. K. Subba Rao, Adv. Ms. Y. Vismai Rao, Adv. for Mr. Y. Raja Gopala Rao, AOR(NP) For Respondent(s) Mr. Vivek Chib, Adv. Mr. Gautam Narayan,Adv. Mr. Joby P. Varghese, Adv. Mr. Mubashir, Adv. Mr. Kushal Gupta, Adv. Mr. Asif Ahmad, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice to the respondent to show cause as to why the appeal be not admitted. Mr. Vivek Chib, Advocate has entered appearance on behalf of the respondent. He seeks an adjournment, so as to enable the respondent to file counter affidavit. Prayer is allowed. Counter affidavit be filed within four weeks. Rejoinder, if any, be filed within two

weeks thereafter.

List thereafter. 4

In the meantime, the appellant shall comply with the impugned order within two days from today. Consequent upon compliance (within two days), further contempt proceedings pending against the appellant shall remain stayed.

It is also made clear that the release of signals, by the appellant, shall be subject to the final outcome of this appeal.

(Parveen Kr.Chawla) (Phoolan Wati Arora) Court Master Assistant Registrar 5 ITEM NO.38/2 COURT NO.12 SECTION XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). D9971 OF 2014 EENADU TELEVISION PVT.LTD. Appellant (s) VERSUS TELECOM REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF INDIA & ORS Respondent(s) (With appln(s) for permission to appeal and office report) Date: 08/05/2014 This Appeal was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. GOPALA GOWDA For Appellant(s) Mr. Maninder Singh, Sr. Adv. Mr. Balaji Srinivasan,Adv. Mr.Mayank Kshirsagar, Adv. Mr. Prabhat Ranjan, Adv. Ms. Vaishali Dixit, Adv. Ms. Srishti Govil, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Saket Singh, Adv. (TRAI) Mrs. Niranjana Singh, Adv. Ms. Sangeeta Singh, Adv. Mrs. Kumar Rajan Mishra, Adv. Mrs. Prerna Singh, Adv. Mrs. Tanya Singh, Adv. for Indusind Media Mr. Shashwat Bajpai, Adv.

Communication Ltd. Mr. Arpit Maheshwari, Adv.

UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

Delay is condoned.

for Mr. Navin Chawla, AOR(NP)

Appellant is permitted to file the civil appeal. Issue notice to the respondents to show cause as to why the appeal be not admitted.

Mr. Saket Singh, Advocate has entered appearance on behalf of Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) 6

and Mr. Shashwat Bajpai, Advocate has entered appearance on behalf of Indusind Media Communication Limited.

Learned counsel representing the TRAI submits that the controversy arising in the instant appeal, is pending consideration before this Court in Civil Appeal Nos.2248-2249 of 2013 and other connected matters. In view of the submission of the learned counsel, tag the instant appeal with Civil Appeal Nos.2248-2249 of 2013 and other connected matters.

(Parveen Kr.Chawla) (Phoolan Wati Arora) Court Master Assistant Registrar