The Goa Foundation vs. The State Of Goa

COURT NO.4

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Civil Appeal No(s). 2135/2024

THE GOA FOUNDATION

Appellant( $s$ )

VERSUS

THE STATE OF GOA & ORS.

Respondent $(s)$

(IA No. 267501/2024 - APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS)

Date: 13-05-2025 This matter was called on for hearing today.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY S. OKA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN

For Appellant(s) :

Ms. Norma Alvares, Sr. Adv. Ms. Srishti Agnihotri, AOR Mr. Om D'Costa, Adv. Ms. Tara Elizabeth Kurien, Adv. Mr. D.P.Singh, Adv.

For Respondent(s) :

• Mr. Atmaram S.Nadkarni, Sr.Adv.
• Mr. Gajanand Kirodiwal, Adv.
• Mr. Gaurauvardhan Nadkarni, Adv.
• Mr. Ankit Tiwari, Adv.
• Mr. Faisal Sherwani, AOR
• Mr. Nalin Kohli, Sr. Adv.
• Mr. Anshul Malik, Adv.
• Mr. Sri Harsha Peechara, Adv.
• Mr. Shishir Deshpande, AOR
• Mr. Duvvuri Subrahmanya Bhanu, Adv.

Mr. Ranjit Kumar, Sr. Adv. Mr. Coelho Pereira, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mohit Paul, AOR Mr. Ayush Agrawal, Adv. Mr. Vikrant Singh Bloria, Adv. Mr. Sushant Tomar, Adv. Mr. Somnath Karpe, Adv. Mr. Bernard Fernandes, Adv. Mr. Vilas Pavithran, Adv.

$\mathbf{1}$

Ms. Sanjleena Lal, Adv.

Mr. Ninad Laud, Adv. Mr. Guruprasad Naik, Adv. Mr. Dcosta Ivo Manuel Simon, AOR Mr. Ninad Laud, Adv. Mr. Ivo D'costa,Adv. Ms. Ishani Shekhar,Adv. Mr. Anjuman Tripathy, AOR Mr. Shashwat Singh, AOR

Mr. Saurav Beniwal,Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

We have perused the reply filed by the seventh respondent. In view of what is asserted in paragraph 18 thereof, by taking the assurance stated therein on record, we find that no case is made out to grant any interim relief against the seventh respondent.

At this stage, the learned counsel appearing for the seventh respondent states that the undertaking given in paragraph 18 will bind the seventh respondent in perpetuity. In view of the statement, we direct deletion of the name of the seventh respondent from the array of parties.

As regards the eighth and the nineth respondents, if the appellant wants to claim any interim relief, it is open for the appellant to file an application.

Our attention is invited to the order dated 19th March, 2024 in Original Application No.98 of 2022. The names of the fifth and the sixth respondents are deleted from the array of parties.

2

However, this order will not preclude the appellant from challenging the said order dated 19th March, 2024 in accordance with law.

(ANITA MALHOTRA) (AVGV RAMU) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER