Manjeet Pathak vs. Mulakh Raj Dhamija

ê6ITEM NO.43 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 4432-4433/2016 TIGHTWELL FASTNERS Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 04/05/2017 These petitions were called on for hearing today. With SLP(C) No. 4438-4439/2016 SLP(C) No. 1856/2016 SLP(C) No. 4440-4451/2016 SLP(C) No. 4452-4463/2016 SLP(C) No. 4410-4421/2016 SLP(C) No. 26635-26636/2016 SLP(C) No. 8122/2016 SLP(C) No. 6198/2016 SLP(C) No. 26637/2016 SLP(C) No. 27973-27974/2016 SLP(C) No. 10397/2017 (With Office Report) Date : 04/05/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. S. S. Shroff,Adv. Mr. P. K. Manohar,Adv. Mr. Suhaas Ratna Joshi,Adv. Mr. Vinay Garg,Adv. Mr.V.S.Chauhan,adv. Mr. Navneet Chaudhary,Adv. Mr.Ravinder Kumar,Adv. Mr. Ajit Sharma,Adv. Mr. R. C. Kaushik,Adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv. Ms. M. Sarada,Adv. Ms. Usha Nandini. V,Adv. Mr.Ajay Jain,Adv. Mr. Jinendra Jain,Adv. Mr. Ugra Shankar Prasad,Adv. ⬠¦..........2 ITEM NO.43 -2- SC4432-33/16 For Respondent(s) Mr. Ajay Marwah,Adv. Mr.Satish Kumar,Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen,Adv. Ms. Usha Nandini. V,Adv. Mr. Gaurav Kejriwal, Adv. Mr.Angad Mehta,Adv. Mr. P. S. Sudheer, Adv. Mr. S. S. Shroff, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C) No.26637/2016 Await the return of service of notice already issued to the respondent Nos.1-13. The respondent Nos.14-222 have been deleted by order dated 5.09.2016 of the Hon'ble Court. SLP(C) No.8122/2016 Service is complete on the respondent Nos.1-11 & 13, but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. As per postal tracking report in respect of the respondent No.12 the remarks shows that ⬠Sinsufficient address⬠\235. Hence, Ld.counsel for the petitioner shall within a period of four weeks file the fresh particulars of the above respondent and he shall also take fresh steps for the service of notice to him within the same period. The respondent Nos.14-232 have been deleted by order dated 5.09.2016 of the Hon'ble Court. SLP(C) No.27973-74/2016 The respondent Nos.3-224 have been deleted by order dated 14.09.2016 of the Hon'ble Court. Ld.counsel for the petitioner is directed to take fresh steps in respect of the other unserved respondents within two weeks. ⬠¦.3 ITEM NO.43 -3- SC4432-33/16 SLP(C) Nos.10397/2017 Service is complete on the respondent Nos.1-9, 11,12 & 13, but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. As per postal tracking report in respect of the respondent No.10 the remarks shows that ⬠Sdoor locked⬠\235. Hence, Ld.counsel for the petitioner shall within a period of four weeks file the fresh particulars of the above respondent and he shall also take fresh steps for the service of notice to him within the same period. The respondent Nos.14-234 have been deleted by order dated 03.04.2017 of the Hon'ble Court. SLP(C) No.4432-33, 4438-39 & 1856/2016 The respondents have failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules. Hence, list the matter before the Hon'ble Court as per rules. SLP(C) No.4440-51 & 4452-63/2016 In respect of the respondent No.6 in SLP(C) No.4452-63/2016, Ld.coundel for the petitioner to serve the counsel appearing for him in the connected matter and file proof. Registry to issue dasti notice to this effect. SLP(C) Nos.4444-45/16, 4456-57/2016 In respect of the respondent No.10 in SLP(C) No.4444-45/2016, Ld.coundel for the petitioner to serve the counsel appearing for him in the connected matter and file proof. Registry to issue dasti notice to this effect. SLP(C) Nos.4462-63/2016 Ld.counsel for the petitioner has filed the requisites in respect of the respondent Nos.6-8 after the period prescribed for such filing. The delay has been satisfactorily explained by the Ld.counsel. Therefore, the same is condoned, and, accordingly, notice shall be issued to the above respondents with utmost dispatch. SLP(C) Nos.4410-11/2016 As per Trial Court report the respondent No.6 has left the house. ⬠¦.....4 ITEM NO.43 -4- SC4432-33/16 Hence, Ld.counsel for the petitioner shall within a period of four weeks file the fresh particulars of the above respondent and he shall also take fresh steps for the service of notice to him within the same period. SLP(C) Nos.4414-15/2016 Service is complete on the respondent No.9, but no one has entered appearance on his behalf. As per Trial Court report, the respondent No.10 has refused to accept the notice. This refusal on his part constitutes proper service, but no one has entered appearance. SLP(C) Nos.4416-17/2016 As per Trial Court report the respondent No.15 has left the address. Hence, Ld.counsel for the petitioner shall within a period of four weeks file the fresh particulars of the above respondent and he shall also take fresh steps for the service of notice to him within the same period. SLP(C) No.6198/2016 The respondent Nos.1 & 2 have failed to file the counter affidavit. Service is complete on the respondent Nos.3-13, but no one has

entered appearance on their behalf. The respondent Nos.14-230 have been deleted by order dated 14.03.2016 of the Hon'ble Court. Hence, list the matter before the Hon'ble Court as per rules. SLP(C) No.26635-36/2016 File not received. List incomplete matters on 3.08.2017. (M V RAMESH)

Registrar

SB