Manjeet Pathak vs. Mulakh Raj Dhamija
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
14 Jan 2016
Order Text
Item No.75 1
REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 495/2016 SHREE KRISHNA STEELS AND ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS MULAKH RAJ DHAMIJA AND ORS. Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 1162/2016 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 1179/2016 Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4432-4433/2016 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4438-4439/2016 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 1856/2016 Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4440-4451/2016 Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4452-4463/2016 (With (With (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned order and appln.(s) for permission to file additional documents and appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) Signature Not Verified SLP(C) No. 4410-4421/2016 Digitally signed by POOJA SHARMA Date: 2016.08.11 (With (With appln.(s) for permission to file additional documents 16:27:07 IST Reason: and appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4434-4435/2016 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) Item No.75 2 SLP(C) No. 6198/2016
Date : 11/08/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today.
| For Petitioner(s) | Mr. Saurav Arora,Adv.<br>Mr. S. S. Shroff,Adv.<br>Mr. Malak Bhatt,Adv. | |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Shashi Bhushan,Adv.<br>Mr. Vinay Garg,Adv. | ||
| Mr. V.S. Chauhan,Adv.<br>Mr. Navneet Chaudhary,Adv. | ||
| Mr. Siddharth Batra,Adv.<br>Mr. Ajit Sharma,Adv. | ||
| Mr. R. C. Kaushik,Adv.<br>Ms. M. Sarada,Adv. | ||
| For Respondent(s) | Mr. Ajay Marwah,Adv. | |
| Mr. Satish Kumar,Adv.<br>Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen,Adv. | ||
| Ms. Usha Nandini. V,Adv. | ||
| Mr. S. S. Shroff,Adv. | ||
| UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following<br>O R D E R |
SLP(C) No. 1856/2016
Ld. Counsel for the petitioners has stated that he has already filed the proof of dasti service in respect of all the respondents. Office shall verify the position and report accordingly.
SLP(C) Nos. 4440-4451,4452-4463 and 4410-4421/2016 Mr. Siddharth Batra, Ld. Counsel for the petitioners has stated that he is unable to file the proof of dasti in respect of the unserved respondents hence, fresh steps for the service of Item No.75 3
notice by usual mode to all the unserved respondents shall be taken by the learned counsel for the petitioners within a period of four weeks. Dasti in addition is permitted to be served through the Trial Court the particulars of which shall be furnished by the learned counsel for the petitioner within the period prescribed above.
In rest of the matters four weeks time, as last chance is given to the learned counsel for the petitioners for filing the affidavit in proof of dasti service of notice already issued to the unserved respondents.
List again on 23.9.2016.
(M V RAMESH) Registrar
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order