Dayakorben Wd/O Maganlal Parbhubhai (D) Thr. Lrs. Kirtikumar Maganlal vs. Babubhai Govindbhai(Dead)
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
27 Jan 2014
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.6 | COURT NO.1 | SECTION IX | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F<br>RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS | I N D I A | |||||||
I.A. 4/2014 in Civil Appeal | No(s). | 1775/2014 | ||||||
BABUBHAI GOVINDBHAI & ORS | Appellant(s)/<br>Applicant(s) | |||||||
VERSUS | ||||||||
DAYAKORBEN & ORS | Respondent(s) | |||||||
(for stay and office report) | ||||||||
Date : 12/09/2014 | today. | This application was called on for hearing | ||||||
CORAM : | HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE<br>HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH<br>HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN | |||||||
For Appellant(s)/<br>For Applicant(s) | Mr. Kapil Sibal, Sr. Adv.<br>Mr. B.S. Patel, Adv.<br>Mr. Purvish Jitendra Malkan,Adv. | |||||||
For Respondent(s) | Mr. C.A. Sundaram, Sr. Adv.<br>Ms. Diksha Rai, Adv. | |||||||
Mr. Rashmikumar Manilal Vithlani,Adv. | ||||||||
Mr. Subramonium Prasad,Adv.<br>Ms. Neha Aggarwal, Adv.<br>Ms. Tatvani Patel, Adv. | ||||||||
Rajesh Dham<br>Date: 2014.09.13 | Signature Not Verified<br>Digitally signed by | Mr.<br>Mr. | Shyam Divan, Sr. Adv.<br>Pradhuman Gohil, Adv. | |||||
09:23:34 IST<br>Reason: | Mr.<br>Ms. | Vikash Singh,Adv. | Taruna Singh Gohil, Adv. | |||||
Ms.<br>Ms. | 2 | Jaikriti Sinh Jadeja, Adv.<br>Prabuddha Sharma, Adv. | ||||||
Mr.<br>Mr.<br>Ms.<br>Mr. | Amar Dave, Adv.<br>Abhishek Singh, Adv.<br>Priyanka Rai, Adv.<br>Chirag M. Shroff, Adv. |
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
Issue notice on Interlocutory Application No. 4 of 2014, returnable in eight weeks.
Dasti, in addition to the ordinary process, is permitted.
Mr. C.A. Sundaram, learned senior counsel for original sellers (respondent Nos. 1 to 4 herein) states that the entire FSI of the subject plot has been consumed and now no more construction is to be made on the subject land and as regards B-1 and B-2 towers although construction is complete, finishing work is to be done.
We record and accept the above statement made by the learned senior counsel for the respondent Nos. 1 to 4.
After service of the application on the respondents, the matter may be considered for further interim relief.
COURT MASTER COURT MASTER
(RAJESH DHAM) (RENU DIWAN)