Shashi Kumar vs. Mam Chand
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
23 Apr 2012
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MRS. RACHNA GUPTA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 28036/2011 SHASHI KUMAR Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s) (with office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 28070/2011 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 14216/2012 (With appln.(s) for setting aside an abatement and appln.(s) for substitution and appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 15981/2012 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for substitution and appln.(s) for substitution and appln.(s) for substitution and appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. and appln.(s) for setting aside an abatement and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 15987/2012 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 15990/2012 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 18079/2013 (With Office Report) Date : 15/07/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rajeev Dubey,Adv. Mr. Shish Pal Laler,Adv. Mr. P. N. Puri,Adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. K.R. Punia,Adv. Mr. Jagdeep Kumar Sharma,Adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv. Digitally signed by Rupam Dhamija Date: 2015.07.23 14:47:30 IST Reason: Signature Not Verified
ITEM NO.7 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IVB
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
SLP(c)No.28036 of 2011
Application for substituting legal representatives of the deceased respondent nos. 12, 34, 40 and 45 is still defective.
Also the application for deleting the name of respondent no. 18 is defective.
Petitioner to cure the defects in these applications. Whereafter the same shall be processed as per rules.
With respect to respondent nos. 29 and 39, petitioner has to take steps for substituting the legal representatives as the notice has been received with the remarks 'expired'.
For respondent no.43, petitioner still to furnish the fresh address.
SLP(c) No.28070 of 2011
Petitioner has to file the affidavit as proof of Dasti Service with respect to respondent no. 4 as still awaited.
Petitioner to take appropriate steps for the same.
Registry to report the status of remaining respondents.
SLP(c) No.14216 of 2012
Application for substituting the legal representatives of the deceased respondent no. 4 has been filed. Be processed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers.
Service of respondent nos.1 to 3 and 5 is complete. But none has entered the appearance.
Item No.7
SLP(c) No.15981 of 2012
Affidavit as proof of service of notice of motion is still awaited with respect to respondent no.1.
Be filed within four weeks time.
SLP(c) No.15987 of 2012
Affidavit as proof of service of notice of motion is still awaited with respect to respondent no.4.
Be filed within four weeks time.
SLP(c) No.15990 of 2012
Vakalatnama on behalf of respondent nos.2& 4 to 11 has been filed. However, counter affidavit is still awaited.
Be filed within four weeks time.
For respondent nos. 1 & 3, petitioner still to file the affidavit of proof of service.
SLP(c)No. 18079 of 2013
Sole respondent has already filed the counter affidavit.
This petition stands complete. However, to be listed along with the connected petitions.
List on 09th September, 2015.
(RACHNA GUPTA) Registrar