State Bank Of India vs. K. S. Srikantha

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA <u>SECTION ΧVI</u>A CIVIL OFIGINAL JURISDICTION LISTED ON <u>LD. REGISTRAR COURT:</u> ITEM No. TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) NO. $0F_{201}$ G $1.404$ completed Sharing VERSUS ....Petitioner $-1$ ligotog :....Respondent OFFICE REPORT The Transfer Petition above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court / Ld. Registrar Court on $\frac{1}{3}$ $\frac{2}{3}$ ) i.e., 201 when the Court / he was granted / directed $\mathcal{C}$ notified READY / FOR THE REASON. Telecordingly, Notice was issued to the sole Respondent Inrough Registered A.D. Post on as well as Dast / through Trial Court. It is submitted that unserved cover containing the notice has been received $2$ . bock from sole Respondent with the Postal remarks," II is submilled that neither A.D. Card nor unserved cover has been received back from sole respondent so far. of the submitted that A.D. Card duly signed by the sole Respondent Ras been $\beta$ . It is submitted that Service Report has been received from the Ticil Court stating $a_{\frac{1}{2}}$ . The counsel has filed an Affidavit of service after effecting Dasti service on the Respondent No. 3 7 has not filed Affidavit of service of dast notice. when the distinction of the Dike Shiha $0_{\odot}$ ( $l$ 6) 3)) 6 Advocate $b_0$ $b_1$ $c_{0}$ $\int d\epsilon d$ toy have es fordeur CSERVICE OF NOTICE IS WOPCOMPLETER TO THE REPORT OF THE PROPERTY OF THE SERVICE OF THE RESIDENCE OF THE CONTRACT OF THE CONTRACT OF THE CONTRACT OF THE CONTRACT OF THE CONTRACT OF THE CONTRACT OF THE CONTRACT OF THE CONTRA The matter (s) is $l$ are listed before the Court of Ld. Registrar with this Office Report. $2012$ $\mathcal{B}$ c $\mathcal{C}$ <u>CODY TO:</u> ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Advocate Mr. R. Mohr Jan Advocale Harrish Sinha Adu NASSISTANT REGISTRAR