Bhagwati Devi vs. Babulal
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
After Week/Month/Vacation
Before:
Hon'ble M.R. Shah, Hon'ble B.V. Nagarathna
Stage:
FRESH (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES
Remarks:
Dismissed
Listed On:
8 Jan 2022
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.3 COURT NO.9 SECTION IV-C
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No(s). 159/2021
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 20-04-2017 in SA No. 410/2000 18-02-2020 in RP No. 47/2018 passed by the High Court Of M.P. At Gwalior)
BHAGWATI DEVI & ORS. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
BABULAL & ORS. Respondent(s)
(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.3837/2021-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.3838/2021-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.3839/2021-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.)
Date : 01-08-2022 These matters were called on for hearing today.
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V. NAGARATHNA
| For Petitioner(s) | Mr. Ravindra Srivastava, Sr. Adv. |
|---|---|
| Mr. Divyakant Lahoti, AOR | |
| Ms. Praveena Bisht, Adv. | |
| Mr. Abhijeet Srivastava, Adv. | |
| Mr. Parikshit Ahuja, Adv. | |
| Ms. Madhur Jhavar, Adv. | |
| Ms. Vindhya Mehra,Avd. | |
| Mr. Kartik Lahoti, Adv. | |
| For Respondent(s) |
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
Having heard Mr. Ravindra Srivastava, learned Senior Advocate, appearing for the petitioners and having gone through the impugned judgment and order(s) passed by the High Court as well as the Appellate Court and the learned trial Court, we see no reason to interfere with the same in exercise of powers under Article 136 of the Constitution of India. The Special Leave Petitions stand dismissed. In addition, it is to be noted that, in the present Digitally signed by R Natarajan Date: 2022.08.02 16:52:21 IST Reason: Signature Not Verified
case, the Civil Suit is of the year 1962 and approximately 60 years had passed and even after 60 years, the parties are still in the Court. At one point of time, the litigation must come to an end and today is the day to come to an end of the litigation.
With this, the Special Leave Petitions stand dismissed on the ground of delay as well as on merits.
Pending applications stand disposed of.
(R. NATARAJAN) (NISHA TRIPATHI) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR