Ajay Jose vs. The State Of Tamil Nadu

@

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.P.BHADRAN

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 3/2006

STATE OF TAMIL NADU Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

STATE OF KERALA & ANR. Respondent(s)

(With appln(s) for ex-Parte stay,c/delay in filing counter affidavit,taking affidavit on record,PERMISSION TO FILE SUPPLEMENTARY AFFIDAVIT and office report )

Date: 21/04/2008 This Petition was called on for hearing today.

For Petitioner(s) Mr. R. Nedumaran,Adv.

Petitioner-In-Person

For Respondent(s) Mr. G. Prakash,Adv. Mr. D.S. Mahra ,Adv Mr. K.R. Sasiprabhu, Adv.

UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following ORDER

Plaintiff and Defendant No.1 have filed documents.

No document is filed by defendant No.2.

There is also no request for the same.

The learned counsels for the States of Tamil Nadu and

Kerala are granted two weeks' time to file affidavit regarding denial

and admission of the documents.

List again on 5.5.2008. (M.P.BHADRAN) Registrar hj @ ITEM NO.126 REGISTRAR'S COURT NO.1 SECTION IIIA

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.P.BHADRAN

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 3/2006

STATE OF TAMIL NADU Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

STATE OF KERALA & ANR. Respondent(s) (With appln(s) for ex-Parte stay,c/delay in filing counter affidavit,taking affidavit on record,PERMISSION TO FILE SUPPLEMENTARY AFFIDAVIT and office report ) Date: 21/04/2008 This Petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. R. Nedumaran,Adv. Petitioner-In-Person For Respondent(s) Mr. G. Prakash,Adv. Mr. D.S. Mahra ,Adv Mr. K.R. Sasiprabhu, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following ORDER Plaintiff and Defendant No.1 have filed documents. No document is filed by defendant No.2. There is also no request for the same. The learned counsels for the States of Tamil Nadu and Kerala are granted two weeks' time to file affidavit regarding denial and admission of the documents. List again on 5.5.2008. (M.P.BHADRAN) Registrar hj