Haryana Urban Development Authority Through Its Administrator vs. Horizon Rubber Products Ltd. Through Its Director Shri Parveen K. Kapoor

" ITEM NO.100 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IVB

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMAS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).21354/2011

ANIL AGGARWAL Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

STATE OF HARYANA & ORS Respondent(s) (With prayer for interim relief and office report)

WITH SLP(C) NO. 23630 of 2011 (With prayer for interim relief and office report)

Date: 05/12/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.

For Petitioner(s) Mr. Lalit Takru, Adv.

Mr. Abhijit Kumar Chattopadhyay, Adv. Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal,Adv.

Mr. Vikas Mehta, Adv. Ms. Utkarsha Kohli, Adv.

Mr. Vikas Mehta,Adv.

For Respondent(s) Mr. P.N. Puri, AOR Ms. Reeta Dewan,Adv.

Mr. Manjit Singh, Adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta, Adv.

Mr. Govind Goel, Adv. Dr. Kailash Chand, Adv.

Ms. Anubha Agarwal, Adv. Dr. Monika Gusain, Adv.

UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

IN SLP (C) 21354 OF 2011

Respondent Nos. 4 to 10, 13 and 15 have filed counter affidavits through Mr. P.N. Puri, Advocate.

Respondent No.3 takes notice through Dr. Kailash Chand. -2-

Respondent No.1 takes notice through Mr. Manjit Singh, Advocate.

The above two respondents are granted four weeks' time for filing Vakalatnama and counter affidavit.

Respondent No.14 also seeks four weeks time for filing counter affidavit. Granted.

Await return of notice of respondent Nos. 1 to 3 and 11.

The other remaining respondents may also file

their counter affidavits within four weeks.

It is submitted that respondent No.3 has not been served with the copy of the pleadings. Counsel for the petitioner is directed to serve copy of pleadings on respondent No.3 when Vakalatnama is filed and file proof of the same. Respondent No.3 shall file counter affidavit within four weeks thereafter.

IN SLP (C) 23630 of 2011

Mr. P.N. Puri, Advocate has filed counter affidavit on behalf of respondent Nos. 6,7,9 to 12, 14 and 17.

Respondent No.3 takes notice through Dr. Kailash Chand.

The petitioner is directed to serve copy of the pleadings on filing of the Vakalatnama.

Respondent No.3 is granted four weeks' time for filing counter affidavit thereafter.

Ms. Monika Gusain takes notice on behalf of respondent No.1 and 2 only. The above respondents are granted four weeks time for filing Vakalatnama and counter affidavit.

Await return of notice on respondent Nos. 1 to 5, 8 , 13, 15 and 16.

All the remaining respondents are granted four weeks for filing counter affidavit. -3-

Mr. P.N. Puri, Advocate and Mr. Rahul Gupta, Advocate submit that though Vakalatnama has been filed, their names have not been shown in the cause list. Registry to update the same.

It is submitted that in both the cases the Estate Officer is a party and is an employee of the HUDA. The petitioner in both cases is directed to serve notice on Estate Officer through the Standing Counsel of HUDA.

List on 20.01.2012.

(SUNIL THOMAS) Registrar

AK