Haryana Urban Development Authority Through Its Administrator vs. Horizon Rubber Products Ltd. Through Its Director Shri Parveen K. Kapoor

d ITEM NO.13 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR S.G. SHAH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).21354/2011 ANIL AGGARWAL Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ORS Respondent(s) (With prayer for interim relief and office report ) WITH SLP(C) NO. 23630 of 2011 (With prayer for interim relief and office report) SLP(C) NO. 28901-28903 of 2011 (With office report) SLP(C) NO. 31546 of 2011 (With office report) SLP(C) NO. 31549 of 2011 (With office report) SLP(C) NO. 34409 of 2011 (With office report) SLP(C) NO. 34410 of 2011 (With office report) SLP(C) NO. 8218-8232 of 2012 (With office report) SLP(C) NO.23292/2011 SLP(C) NO.24150/2011 Date: 06/11/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sandeep Bhalla,Adv. Mr Siddharth Sangal, Adv. Mr. Anil Kumar Sangal, Adv. Mr. Praveen Kumar, Adv. Mr Govind Goel, Adv. Dr. Kailash Chand, Adv. Mr. Rajesh Srivastava, Adv. Ms Nishtha Kumar, Adv. Mr. Vikas Mehta, Adv. Ms. Tulika Prakash, Adv. Ms Rashmi Rai, Adv. Ms. Tatini Basu, Adv. -2- Item No.13 For Respondent(s) Mr. Rahul Gupta,Adv. Mr Aditya Singh, Adv.

Mr Govind Goel, Adv.

Dr. Kailash Chand ,Adv Mr Anand Mishra, Adv. Dr. (Mrs.) Vipin Gupta, Adv.

UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

Nobody is present for the petitioner in SLP(C) no. 28901-28903 and 31546 of 2011.

Let there be fresh notice with additional dasti service on unserved respondents in SLP(C) nos. 21354,23292,23630,24150 of 2011 as well as in SLP(C) nos. 31546 and 28901-28903 of 2011. The litigant has to confirm dasti notice directly upon the litigant-respondent. However, they are permitted to serve through the nearest Civil Court/Trial Court where private parties are concerned and through standing counsel where State authorities are concerned. Process fee and spare copies are to be filed before 23.11.2012, else list before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for nonprosecution.

If notices are issued, list again on 2.1.2013.

In SLP(C) No. 8218-8232/2012,31549/2011 as well as in SLP(C) No. 34410/2011, petitioner has to file proof of service upon unserved respondents for whom dasti notices are already issued.

In SLP(C) No. 8218-8232/2012, the ld. Advocate for the petitioner states that they have filed an application to delete proforma respondent No.27. Such application be listed

-3-

Item No.13

before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers.

Served respondents in all SLPs may file counter affidavit till then.

If proof of service is filed till then, it goes without saying that there is no need to file fresh proof of service.

| | |(S.G.SHAH) | | | |REGISTRAR |

hj