The State Of Tamil Nadu Rep. By Its Chief Secretary To The Government To Govt. Secretariat, Fort. St. George, Chennai And vs. T. K. S. Elangovan And Ors. Etc. Etc
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
REVISED
ITEM NO.12+17 COURT NO.1 SECTION XII
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Item No.12 :
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).81-83/2017
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 22/12/2016 in WP Nos.4113, 4161 & 4584 of 2016 passed by the High Court Of Madras)
STATE OF TAMIL NADU REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, SECRETARIAT, FORT. ST. GEORGE, CHENNAI AND ETC. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
T.K.S. ELANGOVAN AND ORS. ETC. ETC. Respondent(s) (With interim relief)
Item No.17 :
SLP(C)Nos.258-260/2017 (With interim relief and office report) WITH SLP(C)Nos.262-264/2017 (With interim relief and office report)
Date : 09/01/2017 These petitions were called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
15:39:33 IST Reason:
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO
For Petitioner(s) Mr. Mukul Rohtagi,AG SLP(C)Nos.81-83 Mr. Subramonium Prasad,Sr.Adv. Mr. M. Yogesh Kanna,Adv. Ms. Nithya,Adv. SLP(C)Nos.258-60 Mr. K.K. Venugopal,Sr.Adv. Mr. Shyam Divan,Sr.Adv. Mr. A. Navaneethakrishnan,Sr.Adv. Mr. C. Paramasivam,Adv. Mr. P. Ramesh,Adv. Mr. Y. Arunagiri,Adv. Mr. M.P. Parthiban,Adv. Mr. N. Umapathy,Adv. Digitally signed by SARITA PUROHIT Date: 2017.01.16 Signature Not Verified
| SLP(C)Nos.262-64 | Mr. Chander Uday Singh,Sr.Adv. |
|---|---|
| Mr. C. Paramasivam,Adv. | |
| Mr. P. Ramesh,Adv. | |
| Mr. Y. Arunagiri,Adv. | |
| Mr. M.P. Parthiban,Adv. | |
| For Respondent(s) | Mr. P. Wilson,Sr.Adv. |
| No.1/Caveator | Mr. R. Nedumaran,Adv. |
| No.2(TNPSC) | Mr. K.V. Vijaya Kumar,Adv. |
| Mr. S. Thananjayan,Adv.<br>Mr. K. Balu,Adv. | |
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
Leave granted.
No stay, except insofar as the observations recorded in paragraph 22.11.(b) of the impugned order, which are ordered to be kept in abeyance. Additionally, paragraph 22.11.(d) shall not be implemented, to the extent it requires a meaningful consultative process. It is clarified, that for sub-paragraph (d) afore-mentioned, a meaningful and effective deliberative process will be required, for a selection process to be valid.
With the aforesaid observations, we permit the petitioner-State to enter upon a fresh selection process for Members of the Public Service Commission.
We also clarify, that Respondent No.10 will remain ineligible, for any such fresh selection and appointment.
(Sarita Purohit) (Renuka Sadana) Court Master Assistant Registrar
2
| ITEM NO.12+17 | COURT NO.1 | SECTION XII | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S U P R E M E<br>C O U R T<br>RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS | O F | I N D I A | ||
| Item No.12 : | ||||
| Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).81-83/2017 | ||||
| (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 22/12/2016<br>in WP Nos.4113, 4161 & 4584 of 2016 passed by the High Court Of<br>Madras) | ||||
| STATE OF TAMIL NADU REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF<br>SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, SECRETARIAT, FORT. ST.<br>GEORGE, CHENNAI AND ETC. | Petitioner(s) | |||
| VERSUS | ||||
| T.K.S. ELANGOVAN AND ORS. ETC. ETC.<br>(With interim relief) | Respondent(s) | |||
| Item No.17 : | ||||
| SLP(C)Nos.258-260/2017<br>(With interim relief and office report)<br>WITH<br>SLP(C)Nos.262-264/2017<br>(With interim relief and office report) | ||||
| Date : 09/01/2017 These petitions were called on for hearing today. | ||||
| CORAM :<br>HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE<br>HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD<br>HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO | ||||
| For Petitioner(s)<br>SLP(C)Nos.81-83 | Mr. Mukul Rohtagi,AG<br>Mr. Subramonium Prasad,Sr.Adv.<br>Mr. M. Yogesh Kanna,Adv.<br>Ms. Nithya,Adv. | |||
| SLP(C)Nos.258-60 | Mr. K.K. Venugopal,Sr.Adv.<br>Mr. Shyam Divan,Sr.Adv.<br>Mr. A. Navaneethakrishnan,Sr.Adv.<br>Mr. C. Paramasivam,Adv.<br>Mr. P. Ramesh,Adv.<br>Mr. Y. Arunagiri,Adv.<br>Mr. M.P. Parthiban,Adv.<br>Mr. N. Umapathy,Adv. |
3
| SLP(C)Nos.262-64 | Mr. Chander Uday Singh,Sr.Adv.<br>Mr. C. Paramasivam,Adv.<br>Mr. P. Ramesh,Adv.<br>Mr. Y. Arunagiri,Adv.<br>Mr. M.P. Parthiban,Adv. |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s)<br>No.1/Caveator | Mr. R. Nedumaran,Adv. |
| No.2(TNPSC) | Mr. K.V. Vijaya Kumar,Adv. |
| Mr. S. Thananjayan,Adv.<br>Mr. K. Balu,Adv. |
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
Leave granted.
No stay, except insofar as the observations recorded in paragraph 22.11.(b) of the impugned order, which are ordered to be kept in abeyance. Additionally, paragraph 22.11.(d) shall not be implemented, to the extent it requires a meaningful consultative process. It is clarified, that for sub-paragraph (d) afore-mentioned, a meaningful and effective deliberative process will be required, for a selection process to be valid.
With the aforesaid observations, we permit the petitioner-State to enter upon a fresh selection process for Members of the Public Service Commission.
We also clarify, that Respondent No.10 will remain ineligible, for any such fresh selection and appointment.
(Sarita Purohit) (Renuka Sadana) Court Master Assistant Registrar