Rohan Balan vs. State Panchyati Raj Dep Ors

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6848 / 2013

• 1. Rohan Balan son of Shri Prahlad Rao Saini, aged about 29 years, resident of 77, Ganesh Nagar-II, Sitali Phatak, Bainad Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan
• 2. Dhirendra Singh Asawat son of Shri Jagdish Singh Asawat, aged about 31 years, resident of House No. 29, Gate No. 3, Rajat Colony, Bundi, Rajasthan.
• 3. Aastha Jain daughter of Shri Bhanwar Lal Jain, aged about 27 years, resident of Niwai, District Tonk, Rajasthan.
• 4. Obedulla Khan son of Shri Barkattulla Khan, aged about 32 years, resident of Near Rai Dharamshala, Chippa Barod, District Baran, Rajasthan.
• 5. Dharmchandra Goyal son of Late Shri Hariprasad Goyal, aged about 29 years, resident of Mukhya Market, Bajirpur, Sawai Madhopur, Rajasthan

----Petitioner

1. State of Rajasthan through the Principal Secretary, Rural Development & Panchyati Raj Dep Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.

Versus

• 2. The Chief Executive Officer, Tonk.
• 3. The Chief Executive Officer, Bundi.
• 4. The Chief Executive Officer, Baran.
• 5. The Chief Executive Officer, Dausa.
• 6. The Chief Executive Officer, Jaipur

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Iliyas Khan Adv.

For Respondent(s) : Mr. Y.S. Jadaun Adv.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR GAUR Order

_____________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________

11/10/2017

Counsel for the State submits that the petitioner has filed this writ petition claiming bonus marks for the post of 'APO' which was advertised on 25th March, 2013. Has has also prayed for grant of experience certificate.

Learned counsel for the respondent submits that the said advertisement dt. 25th March, 2013 has been withdrawn by the State Government on 3rd July, 2017 and as such the petition has become infructuous.

Learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute this fact that the impugned advertisement has already been withdrawn. However, issue of grant of experience certificate is not decided in the instant petition.

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous on account of withdrawal of advertisement.

Monika/52

(ASHOK KUMAR GAUR),J.