IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY

FRIDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2016/22ND ASWINA, 1938

WP(C).No. 31900 of 2016 (J)

----------------------------

PETITIONER(S):

-------------

AJI ANTONY, S/O ANTONY, AGED 46 YEARS, RESIDING AT NHAMATHOLIL HOUSE, CHRIST UNIVERSITY, NEAR WONDERLA PARK, BANGALORE.

BY ADV. SRI.MATHEW ABRAHAM

RESPONDENT(S):

--------------

• 1. NJAMATHOLIL ANTONY, S/O SCARIA, AGED 74 YEARS, NHAMATHOLIL HOUSE, CHRIST UNIVERSITY, NEAR WONDERLA PARK, BANGALORE.
• 2. ROSAMMA ANTONY, AGED 64 YEARS, NHAMATHOLIL HOUSE, CHRIST UNIVERSITY, NEAR WONDERLA PARK, BANGALORE.
• 3. THE PRESIDING OFFICER, THE MAINTENANCE TRIBUNAL, UNDER THE MAINTENANCE AND WELFARE AND PARENTS AND SENIOR CITIZENS ACT (THE SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE OFFICE, THALASERY).

BY SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.K.R.DEEPA

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14-10-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 31900 of 2016 (J)

----------------------------

APPENDIX

PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS

EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE SALE DEED DATED 26-03-2005

EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION NO M.C.C. NO 46/15 DATED 25-03-2015

EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FILED BY THE FATHER-IN-LAW OF THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 27-09-2016.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS: NIL

-----------------------

-----------------------

//TRUE COPY//

P.A. TO JUDGE

dlk

SHAJI P. CHALY, J.

---------------------------- W.P.(C) No.31900 of 2016 ----------------------------------------

Dated this the 14th day of October, 2016

JUDGMENT

Petitioner is issued with an order by the Tribunal, under the Kerala Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2009. The main grievance voiced by the petitioner in this writ petition is, in spite of the passage of the said order, no copy is served on the petitioner. Even though other grounds are raised challenging the order, order passed by the tribunal is not before me to consider the same. In that view of the matter I think it is only appropriate that a quietus is given to this writ petition by issuing a direction to the third respondent to issue a copy of the order to the petitioner, at the earliest, and at any rate, within a week from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Accordingly I do so.

Writ petition is disposed of accordingly.

Sd/-

SHAJI P. CHALY,JUDGE

dlk/14/10/