IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS

MONDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF JUNE 2022 / 6TH ASHADHA, 1944

RP NO. 22 OF 2017

AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OPC 2327/2016 OF HIGH COURT

OF KERALA

REVIEW PETITIONER/S:

K.S.SAILENDRANATHA PILLAI AGED 46 YEARS S/O.SIVARAMA PILLAI, SIVASILAM, KALOOR P.O., PIN: 682 017.

BY ADVS. SRI.SEBIN THOMAS SRI.AKHIL BHASKAR SRI.JEEVAN JOY SRI.VIVEK V. KANNANKERI

RESPONDENT/S:

• 1 KARUNAKARA PRABHU,AGED 36 YEARS S/O.LATE HARIDASA PRABHU KARUNA NIVAS, 40/6454, T.D.ROAD, ERNAKULAM KOCHI 35.
• 2 THE SUB REGISTRAR ERNAKULAM, PERUMPALLY BUILDING, M.G.ROAD, PIN: 682 011.

THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27.06.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

The review petition is filed seeking to review the judgment dated 07.11.2016 in OP(C) No.2327/2016 passed by this Court.

2. The review petitioner, who was the petitioner in OP(C) No.2327/2016 had approached this Court seeking to set aside the award dated 17.12.2010 passed by the Lok Adalath, Ernakulam. As per the award the 1 st respondent in the original petition had agreed to close the loan account of the petitioner, on condition that the petitioner would execute a sale deed in respect of the plaint schedule property in favour of the 1st respondent. This Court, has by a detailed judgment, taking note of the fact that even though the award was passed in the year 2010, the petitioner has approached this Court only in the year 2016, dismissed the original petition and confirmed the award passed by the Adalath.

On a consideration of the pleadings and materials on record and hearing the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the 1 st respondent, I do not find any error apparent on the face of the judgment warranting the review of the impugned judgment. The review petition is groundless and is hence dismissed.

Sd/-

C.S.DIAS, JUDGE

rkc/27.06.22