Gaviyappa vs. The Assistant Executive Engineer
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Disposed
Before:
Hon'ble H.Billappa
Listed On:
20 Jun 2005
Order Text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE
. 1
DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JUNE 2005
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H. BILLAPPA
CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 184/2005
BETWEEX :
Gaviyappa S/o Byrappa Since died on 26/11/2003 During pendency of suit The following L.Rs were Sought to be brought on record:
-
- Susheelamma Aged about 45 years,
- Krishnappa Aged about 41 years, Adopted son of Late Gaviyappa
Both are residents of House No.237 (Old No.234) Mariyappana Palya, III Stage, Rajajinagar, Srirampura Post, Bangalore-560021. ... PETITIONERS
(By Sri.H.Neelakanta Rao, Adv., (absent))
AND:
- The Assistant Executive Engineer, No.2 West Sub-Dn., BDA, KPW Extension, Bangalore-560020.
- The commissioner, The Corporation of City of Bangalore, Now Bangalore Mahanagar Palike, J.C.Road, Bangalore-560002.
AKA HIGH C HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH 3H COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
The Commissioner Bangalore Development Authority, KPW Extension, Bangalore-560020.
K.L.Huchaiah S/o Lakkappa, Aged about 62 years R/at No.210, Mariyappana Palya, III Stage Rajajinagar, Srirampura Post, Bangalore-560010.
8 0
H COURT OF KARNATAKA "HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA" HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA "HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA" HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA "HIGH
.. RESPONDENTS
(By Sri.S.N. Prashanth Chandra, Adv., for R-2)
This CRP filed u/sec.115 of Code of Civil Procedure r/w sec.151 of Code of Civil Procedure against the order dated 5.1.05 passed on I.A. in O.S.No.1720/88 on the file of the I Addl. City Civil and Sess. Judge, Bangalore (CCH-2) rejecting the I.A. filed by the petitioner herein u/O 22 R l and 3 r/w sec.151 of Code of Civil Procedure to bring the L.Rs of the petitioner herein on record and consequently dismissing the suit.
This CRP coming on for orders this day, the Court made the following:-
ORDER
Though the matter was called twice there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. In view of this, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/-Judge
P3./-
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order