eCourtsIndia

Syed Rasheed vs. Secretary

Final Order
Court:High Court of Karnataka (Bangalore)
Judge:Hon'ble B.V.Pinto
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:22 Mar 2010
CNR:KAHC010201082010

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Disposed

Before:

Hon'ble B.V.Pinto , K.Sreedhar Rao

Listed On:

22 Mar 2010

Order Text

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT BANGALORE

DATED THIS THE 22<sup>ND</sup> DAY OF MARCH, 2010

PRESENT

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.SREEDHAR RAO

AND

THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE B.V. PINTO

<u>W.P. (HC) NO. 31/2010</u> <u>C/W</u> <u>W.P. (HC) NO. 25/2010</u>

W.P. (HC) NO. 31/2010:-

BETWEEN:-

SYED RASHEED, S/O. SYED IBRAHIM, 4<sup>TH</sup> CROSS, TIPPUNAGAR, SHIMOGA.

PETITIONER

(SUO MOTU)

<u>AND:-</u>

    1. SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, VIDHANA SOUDHA, M.S. BUILDING, BANGALORE.
    1. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CHIKKAMAGALORE DISTRICT, CHIKKAMAGALORE.

3.CITY CRIME BRANCH POLICE,<br/>BANGALORE.RESPONDENTS(BY SRI E.S. INDIRESH, G.A. - SERVED)RESPONDENTS

TELEGRAM SENT BY SYED RASHEED IS TREATED AS A HABEAS CORPUS (SUO-MOTU) AND REGISTERED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA WHEREIN THE PETITIONER HAS PRAYED THIS HON'BLE COURT PRODUCE HIS SON IRFAN AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, ILLEGALLY DETAINED BY THE C.C.B. POLICE, IN KADUR.

W.P. (HC) NO. 25/2010:-

BETWEEN:-

MRS. VIJAYATHA MAHESHWARI. PETITIONER (SUO MOTU)

<u>AND:-</u>

    1. SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, VIDHANA SOUDHA, M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE.
    1. COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, BANGALORE CITY, BANGALORE. RESPONDENTS (BY SRI E.S. INDIRESH, G.A. - SERVED)

TELEGRAM SENT BY MRS. VIJAYATH MAHESHWAR IS TREATED AS A HABEAS CORPUS (SUO-MOTU) AND REGISTERED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA WHEREIN THE PETITIONER HAS PRAYED THIS HON'BLE COURT TO TRACE HER HUSBAND MR. AVINASH KUMAR MAHESHWAR, AGED 26 YEARS, WHO IS TAKEN BY POLICE. These petitions coming on for orders this day. SREEDHAR RAO, J., made the following:-

ORDER

Sri. E.S. Indiresh-Govt. Advocate submits that the detenue in both the cases have been arrested and produced before the court. In that view, the petitions are closed.

Sd/-JUDGE

Gps*

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(1) - 22 Mar 2010

Final Order

Viewing