Pankaj Sharma vs. Hpseb Ltd
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Admission After Notice
Before:
Hon'ble Honble The Acting Chief Justice Mansoor Ahmad Mir , Honourable Mr. Justice V.K. Sharma
Listed On:
29 May 2014
Order Text
LPA No. 430 of 2012 with LPAs No. 434 and 450 of 2012 and 148 of 2014.
LPA No. 430 of 2012.
11.12.2014.Present: Ms. Archana Dutt, Advocate, for the appellants. Mr. Anil God, proxy counsel for respondent No.
1.
Respondents No. 4, 5, 8 to 13, 15, 17 and 18 are already ex parte.
Respondent No. 9 deleted.
LPA No. 434 of 2012.
Mr. K.S. Banyal, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr. Anil God, proxy counsel for respondent No. 1.
Mr. K.D. Sood, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Mukul Sood, Advocate, for respondents No. 2, 3, 6, 7 and 10.
Ms. Archana Dutt, Advocate, for respondent No.5.
Nemo for respondents No. 8, 9, 13 and 14. Respondents No. 4, 11 and 12 ex parte. Respondents No. 15 to 177 stand deleted.
LPA No. 450 of 2012.
Mr. Dilip Sharma, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Nishi Goel, counsel for the appellant.
Mr. K.D. Sood, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Mukul Sood, Advocate, for respondents No. 1, 2 and 9.
Ms. Archana Dutt, Advocate, for respondent No. 4, 8, 11, 12 and 13.
Nemo for respondent No. 7.
Mr. Anil God, proxy counsel for respondent No. 14.
Respondents No. 3, 5, 6 and 10 ex parte. Respondents No. 15 to 177 stand deleted.
LPA No. 148 of 2014.
Mr. Anil God, proxy counsel for the appellant.
Ms. Archana Dutt, Advocate, for respondents No. 4, 7, 12 and 13. Mr. K.D. Sood, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Mukul Sood, Advocate, for respondents No. 57, 73, 84, 85, 89, 95 and 98.
Mr. Anil God, Advocate stated that he was not
in a position to take steps, in terms of order dated 13th
November, 2014. He seeks and is granted two weeks
time to do the needful. List on 26th March, 2015.
(Mansoor Ahmad Mir) Chief Justice.
December 11, 2014 (Dharam Chand Chaudhary) (cm Thakur) Judge.
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order