eCourtsIndia

Pankaj Sharma vs. Hpseb Ltd

Court:High Court of Himachal Pradesh
Judge:Hon'ble Honourable The Chief Justice Mansoor Ahmad Mir
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:10 Dec 2015
CNR:HPHC010130632012

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Admission After Notice

Before:

Hon'ble Honble The Acting Chief Justice Mansoor Ahmad Mir , Honourable Mr. Justice V.K. Sharma

Listed On:

29 May 2014

Order Text

LPAs No.430 of 2012 a/w LPAs No.141 of 2009, 434 & 450 of 2012 and 148 of 2014

LPA No.430 of 2012 10.12.2015 Present: Mr. R.K. Gautam, Senior Advocate with Ms. Archana Dutt, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr. Trilok Jamwal, Advocate, for respondent No.1. Respondents No.2, 4 to 8 and 10 to 18 already ex parte. Name of respondent No.9 stands deleted. LPA No.141 of 2009 Mr. Aman Sood, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 3 and 5. Mr. Sunil Bist, proxy counsel, for appellant No.4. Mr. Trilok Jamwal, Advocate, for respondent No.1.

Mr. K.D. Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sanjeev Sood, Advocate, for respondents No.6 and 15.

Ms. Ranjana Parmar, Senior Advocate with Ms. Komal Kumari, Advocate, for respondents No.9, 10, 12, 16, 19, 22, 24, 25, 27, 38, 39 and 41.

Mr. Dilip Sharma, Senior Advocate with Ms. Nishi Goel, Advocate, for respondents No.40, 42, 43, 46, 47 and 48.

Nemo for other respondents.

LPA No.434 of 2012

Mr. K.S. Banyal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vijender Katoch, Advocate, for the appellant.

Mr. Trilok Jamwal, Advocate, for respondent No.1.

Mr. K.D. Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sanjeev Sood, Advocate, for respondents No.2, 3, 6, 7 and 10.

Respondents No.4, 11 and 12 already ex parte.

Mr. R.K. Gautam, Senior Advocate with Ms. Archana Dutt, Advocate, for respondents No.5, 8, 9, 13 and 14.

Names of respondents No.15 to 177 stand deleted.

LPA No.450 of 2012

Mr. Dilip Sharma, Senior Advocate with Ms. Nishi Goel, Advocate, for the appellant.

Mr. K.D. Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sanjeev Sood, Advocate, for respondents No.1, 2 and 9.

Respondents No.3, 5, 6 and 10 already ex parte.

Mr. R.K. Gautam, Senior Advocate with Ms. Archana Dutt, Advocate, for respondents No.4, 8, 11, 12 and 13.

Mr. Trilok Jamwal, Advocate, for respondent No.14.

Names of respondents No.15 to 177 stand deleted.

LPA No.148 of 2014

Mr. Tarlok Jamwal, Advocate, for the appellant.

Mr. R.K. Gautam, Senior Advocate with Ms. Archana Dutt, Advocate, for respondents No.4, 7, 12 and 13.

Mr. K.D. Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sanjeev Sood, Advocate, for respondents No.57, 73, 84, 85, 89 and 95.

Nemo for other respondents.

Mr. Aman Sood, Advocate seeks and is granted

adjournment on the ground that the mother of Mr. N.K. Sood,

Senior Advocate, who has to argue the matter, has expired.

List on 3rd March, 2016.

( Mansoor Ahmad Mir ), Chief Justice.

( Sureshwar Thakur), Judge.

December 10, 2015 (Tilak/rkv)

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(15) - 29 Jun 2016

Final Order

Click to view

Order(14) - 3 Mar 2016

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(13) - 10 Dec 2015

Interim Order

Viewing

Order(12) - 29 Oct 2015

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(11) - 1 Oct 2015

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(10) - 20 Aug 2015

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(9) - 18 Jun 2015

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(8) - 26 Mar 2015

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(7) - 11 Dec 2014

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(6) - 13 Nov 2014

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(5) - 11 Sept 2014

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(4) - 24 Jul 2014

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(3) - 29 May 2014

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(2) - 24 Apr 2014

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(1) - 1 Nov 2013

Interim Order

Click to view