Saraswathy Amma vs. Jayasreekumar
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Before:
Hon'ble Honourable Ms.Justice V.M.Velumani
Listed On:
29 Mar 2016
Order Text
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
<pre>( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )</pre>Tuesday, the Twenty Ninth day of March Two Thousand Sixteen
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Ms.Justice V.M.VELUMANI
CRP(MD) No.611 of 2016 and CMP (MD) No. $2768$ of 2016
SARASWATHY AMMA
JUDIC
सत्यमेव जयते
WEB COPY
..PETITIONER/NOTA PARTY IN BOTH THE PETITIONS
Vs.
1 JAYASREEKUMAR
..1ST RESPONDENT/PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF IN BOTH THE PETITIONS
- 2 THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, KUZHITHURAI, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT.
- 3 THE CHIEF EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, KANYAKUMART DISTRICT AT NAGERCOIL.
- 4 THE DIRECTOR OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, (HIGHER SECONDARY), CHENNAI 600 006.
- 5 THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP BY THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT ..RESPONDENTS 2 TO 5/RESPONDENTS 1 TO 4/ AT NAGERCOIL. RESPONDENTS 2 TO 5
IN BOTH THE PETITIONS
Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to call for the records in connection I.A.No.694 of 2015 in O.S.No.281 of 2015 on the file of Principal District Munsif Court, Kuzhithurai and to allow the Civil Revision Petition and to set aside the same.
<u>Prayer in CMP(MD). 2768/ 2016:</u>
To Suspend the order of injunction made in I.A.No.694 of 2015 in O.S.No.281 of 2015 on the file of District Munsif Court, Kuzhithurai pending disposal of the above CRP(MD)No.611 of 2016.
ORDER : These petitions coming on for orders upon perusing the petitions and the affidavits filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.AJMAL ASSOCIATES, Advocate for the petitioner in both the petitions, the court made the following order:-
Heard.
- Dispute between the petitioner and the first respondent with regard to Management of school. While granting ex-parte injunction, the learned District Munsif, Kuzhithurai did not give any reason for the<br>same. He has just mentioned the balance of convenience is in favour of first respondent made out prima facie case.
In the circumstance, interim injunction granted by the learned $\mathcal{L}$ https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Locality, Linearity, Linearity, Linearity, Linearity, Linearity, Linearity, Linearity, Linearity, Linearity, Linearity, Linearity, Linearity, Linearity, Linearity, Linearity, L Notice.

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO
THE DISTRICT MUNISF, KUZHITHURAI, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT.
ORDER IN CRP(MD) No.611 of 2016 and CMP(MD)No.2768 of 2016 Date :29/03/2016
PBK/AN-MP/SAR-I 29/03/2016 ::2P-2C::
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order