Govindan vs. Govindan
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Disposed
Before:
Hon'ble Honourable Mr Justice V.Sivagnanam
Listed On:
30 Jul 2024
Order Text


IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 30.07.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.SIVAGNANAM
S.A.Nos.1636 & 1637 of 2011 and M.P.Nos.1 & 1 of 2011
S.A.No.1636 of 2011
Govindan S/o. Vadamalai Padayachi ... Appellant
Vs.
Govindan S/o. Nallaperumal ... Respondent
PRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C. against the judgment and decree of the Additional District Sessions (Fast Track Court), Kallakurichi dated 28.09.2007 in A.S.No.158 of 2002, confirming the judgment and decree of the II Additional District Munsif Court at Kallakurichi dated 11.08.1998 in O.S.No.115 of 1992.
S.A.No.1637 of 2011
- Govindan S/o. Vadamalai Padayachi

- Srinivasan S/o. Vadamalai Padayachi 3. Venkatajalam S/o. Vadamalai Padayachi
- Minor Sangeetha, rep. By her guardian & father Govindan ... Appellants
Vs.
Govindan S/o. Nallaperumal ... Respondent
PRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C. against the judgment and decree of the Additional District Sessions (Fast Track Court), Kallakurichi dated 28.09.2007 in A.S.No.10 of 2004, confirming the judgment and decree of the II Additional District Munsif Court at Kallakurichi dated 11.08.1998 in O.S.No.958 of 1993.
| For<br>Appellant<br>in<br>both<br>Appeals | : Mr. T.R.Gayathri<br>for<br>Sarvabhauman<br>Associates |
|---|---|
| For Respondent<br>in<br>both<br>Appeals | : Mr.R. Meenal |
C O M M O N J U D G M E N T
Both the Second Appeals have been filed against the judgment and decree passed in A.S.No.158 of 2002 and A.S.No.10 of 2004, dated


28.09.2007 on the file of the Additional District Sessions (Fast Track) Court, Kallakurichi, confirming the judgment and decree passed in O.S. No.115 of 1992 & O.S.No.958 of 1993, dated 11.08.1998, on the file of the II Additional District Munsif Court, Kallakurichi.
2.When the matters are taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent submitted that the sole respondent died on 26.01.2023.
3.So far no steps have been taken to bring the legal representatives of the sole respondent in both the Second Appeals. Hence, both the Second Appeals are dismissed as abated. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions, if any, are also closed.
30.07.2024
mrp Internet:Yes Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non speaking order NCC: Yes/No
To
-
The Additional District Sessions (Fast Track Court), Kallakurichi
-
The II Additional District Munsif Court, Kallakurichi


V.SIVAGNANAM, J.
mrp
S.A.Nos.1636 & 1637 of 2011
30.07.2024
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order