Shri Mahendra S/O Mahadeo Deshbhratar vs. Shri Kailash S/O Bhauraoji Chandankhede

Final Order
Court:Bombay High Court (Panaji Bench, Goa)
Judge:Hon'ble V.A. Naik
Case Status:Admitted
Order Date:17 Aug 2009
CNR:HCBM040147692009

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Disposed

Listed On:

17 Aug 2009

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR

Second Appeal No. 293 of 2009

    1. SHRI MAHENDRA S/O MAHADEO DESHBHRATAR R/O NEW DIAMOND NAGAR, INFRONT OF JYOTI PRIMARY SCHOOL, NAGPUR
    1. SHRI RAMCHANDRA S/O CHINTAMAN AWATHE R/O GANDHIBAG, JAGNATH BUDHWARI ROAD, NAGPUR
    1. SAU. KAUSALYA W/O RAMCHANEDRA AWATHE R/O GANDHIBAG, JAGNATH BUDHWARI ROAD, NAGPUR .. PETITIONER/S VERSUS
    1. SHRI KAILASH S/O BHAURAOJI CHANDANKHEDE R/O NEW GADGE BABA NAGAR, NAGPUR .. RESPONDENT/S
­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,Court's or Judge's orders
appearances, Court's orders of directions
and Registrar's orders
­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­

Mr. C.S. Samudra, Advocate for the appellants.

CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATE : AUGUST 17 , 2009.

C.A.S. No. 589/2009

Heard the learned counsel for the applicants. None appears on behalf of the respondents, though time was granted at the request of the counsel for the respondent on 10th of August, 2009.

Since the second appeal is admitted on the substantial questions of law, it is necessary to stay the effect and operation of the judgment and decree passed by the first appellate Court.

Hence, during the pendency of the second appeal, the judgment and decree passed by the first appellate Court is stayed.

C.A. is allowed and disposed of.

JUDGE

RMP