eCourtsIndia

Kiran Rajkumar Kale vs. Rajkumar Angad Kale

Interim Order
Court:Bombay, High Court
Judge:Hon'ble V.K. Jadhav
Case Status:Withdrawn
Order Date:26 Oct 2016
CNR:HCBM030317022016

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

For Admission / Circulation [ Fresh ][Civil Side Matters]

Before:

Hon'ble Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sunil P. Deshmukh

Listed On:

14 Sept 2016

Order Text

drp

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO.165 OF 2016

Kiran Rajkumar Kale APPLICANT

VERSUS

Rajkumar Angad Kale RESPONDENT

....... Mr. M. S. Shaikh h/f MR. S. S. Deshmukh, Advocate for applicant Mr. M. M. Patil (Beedkar) Advocate for respondent

.......

[CORAM : SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.]

DATE : 26th OCTOBER, 2016

ORDER :

  1. Mr. Beedkar, learned advocate for the respondent refers to that Miscellaneous Civil Application Stamp No.33204 of 2016 has been lodged by the respondent seeking transfer of Regular Civil Suit No.344 of 2016 filed by applicant in the court of civil judge, senior division, Latur to a court at Ambajogai and requests that both the miscellaneous civil applications be taken up together. Learned advocate for the applicant does not have any particular resistance to the request.

  2. As such, present miscellaneous civil application be placed with miscellaneous civil application stamp No.33204 of 2016.

  3. Since, learned advocate for the applicant refers to that the applicant has no notice of miscellaneous civil application stamp No.33204 of 2016, he may not get power to appear in said matter.

  4. As such, put up both the matters on 29th November, 2016. By then, it is expected that learned advocate for the applicant may receive instructions in respect of miscellaneous civil application stamp No.33204 of 2016.

  5. In the meanwhile, on instructions, learned advocates state that the parties have expressed their willingness to explore possibility of resolution of inter se dispute through mediation and further agree upon Mr.K. B. Chaudhary, learned advocate, to be their mediator.

  6. As such, Mr. K. B. Chaudhary, learned advocate is requested to act as a mediator between the parties and submit report accordingly. Parties to adhere to the schedule as may be stipulated by the mediator.

  7. Interim relief to continue.

[SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.]

drp/mca165-16

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(4) - 21 Nov 2017

Final Order

Click to view

Order(3) - 29 Nov 2016

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(2) - 26 Oct 2016

Interim Order

Viewing

Order(1) - 14 Sept 2016

Interim Order

Click to view