eCourtsIndia

Viral Rasiklal Shah vs. Rasiklal Trambaklal Shah (Deceased)

Interim Order
Court:Bombay, High Court
Judge:Hon'ble Shri. S. B. Bhansali (Prothonotary Senior Master))
Case Status:Unknown Status
Order Date:18 Nov 2024
CNR:HCBM020273002024

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

For Direction

Before:

Mrs. R. V. Rane, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Listed On:

18 Nov 2024

Order Text

BEFORE : MRS. R. V. RANE COMPANY REGISTRAR / TESTAMENTARY REGISTRAR DATE : 18th November'2024.

Sr. No. 23-TP/4633/2024 (AMH20240129837C202400001)

Mr. Sudhir Yadav i/b. Mr. Shreyas Patel, Advocate for the petitioner.

For Compliance

  1. Perused the Petition. Heard Advocate for petitioner. Advocate for petitioner submits that the present petition is for Succession Certificate in respect of certain Securities belonging to the deceased viz. Rasiklal Trambaklal Shah who died at Mumbai on 16th day of October, 1997. Copy of death certificate is annexed at Exhibit -'A' to the petition. Copy of the identification proof of the deceased is annexed at Exhibit "A1" to the petition.

  2. Advocate for petitioner submits that the said deceased ordinarily resided at Flat No. 7B, Sett Minar, Pedder Road, Mumbai 400026, and left property within Greater Bombay and in the State of Maharashtra.

  3. Advocate for petitioner submits that, the said deceased died intestate and that due and diligent search has been made for the Will but none has been found.

  4. Advocate for petitioner submits that the legal heirs left behind by the deceased surviving as his only heirs nextof-kin according to Hindu Succession Act, 1956 are mentioned in para no. 4 of the said petition.

5. Advocate for the petitioner submits that the parents of the deceased predeceased the deceased.

Advocate for petitioner submits that the deceased left behind him widow and sons viz. (1) Heena Rasiklal Shah (widow of the decease), (2) Viral Rasiklal Shah (son of the deceased/petitioner herein) and (3) Rajal Rasiklal Shah (son of the deceased). Save and except there are no other legal heirs and next of kind left by the deceased, which is mentioned at para no. 4 of the petition.

Advocate for petitioner submits that Heena Rasiklal Shah and Rajal Rasiklal Shah had given their consent for issuance of succession certificate in favour of Viral Rasiklal Shah.

The consent affidavits of Heena Rasiklal Shah and Rajal Rasiklal Shah are annexed separately to the petition.

  1. Advocate for Petitioner submits that being the son of deceased claims to be entitled for 1/3rd share in the estate left by the deceased.

  2. Advocate for petitioner submits that, there is no impediment under Section 370 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 or under any other provision of this Act or any other enactment to the grant of the certificate of the validity thereof if it was granted.

  3. Advocate for petitioner submits that no application has been made to any District Court or District Delegate or to any High Court for probate of any Will of the said deceased or for letters of administration with or without the Will for annexed to their property and credits.

  4. Advocate for petitioner submits that no application has been made to any District Court for Succession Certificate in respect of any debt or security belonging to the estate of the deceased.

  5. Advocate for the petitioner submits that there is delay of filing this petition be condoned as the concerned authorities asked for legal representation to transfer the property in favour of the Legal heirs. In view thereof, delay is condoned.

  6. Advocate for the petitioner submits that the General Notice was issued on 05.10.2024 in the aforesaid matter. Advocate for the petitioner submits that Affidavit of Service dated 22.10.2024 for proving General Notice filed through e-filing and Administration Bond dated 04.11.2024 also filed through e-filing.

  7. This petition is filed for grant of Succession Certificate in respect to the securities which was mentioned in Schedule-1 which is annexed to the petition. The petitioner has complied all the necessary compliance for grant of the Succession Certificate in favor of the petitioner. Hence, facts stated by petitioner, on oath, remained unchallenged and required to be accepted. Accordingly, petition deserves to be allowed, as prayed for. Hence, following order :

ORDER

  1. Petition is allowed and the Succession Certificate be granted to the petitioner for certain securities left by the deceased and shown in the schedule, in prescribed format. Petition is expedited since one of the legal heir is 85 years old i.e. widow of the deceased.

  2. Before issuance of the grant, the office to verify whether any cross Petition is pending or Affidavit resisting the petition is filed.

  3. The petitioner to file an account as undertaken in the Administration Bond within stipulated period. Necessary endorsement be made on the Administration Bond, subject to satisfaction of the Department.

COMPANY REGISTRAR / TESTAMENTARY REGISTRAR

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(2) - 18 Nov 2024

Interim Order

Viewing

Order(1) - 5 Oct 2024

Interim Order

Click to view